Re: [arch-d] Possible IAB Adoption of draft-kpw-iab-privacy-partitioning

Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net> Thu, 24 November 2022 14:13 UTC

Return-Path: <caw@heapingbits.net>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9505C14CEEB for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 06:13:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=heapingbits.net header.b=Jwje+5eO; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=TEekU9lY
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id onUN4m341ADf for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 06:13:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8D74C14CEE7 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 06:13:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778323200A06 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 09:13:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap41 ([10.202.2.91]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 24 Nov 2022 09:13:46 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heapingbits.net; h=cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1669299225; x=1669385625; bh=QVgQ4dibSC CI/fCOFR5evm3MELuwVX9Yz/keqyRdQfI=; b=Jwje+5eOVYnlbb/thdoeMftXfa e+w76yCmJQuxqsQZRK9F2qoMiLroaW9z2j9JrSaCIdpwFtb4SzLo6HpgcjUksjTZ OkvdCbS0P1TIiQrGrJm/EWgP9QN8iNVCduoH463lPRUUsiNDeLJUeEkFBxFxnmpa /yw0t2XSvP8xLpL9rmpl6qKE7Qzv5NZbfFRZNsdIns28Dmd3mk0/w847PweqOrrP T5fWKMzlXQDMbhctHY/f55lUJ1QJRYJQ5eTPZ1+cGurY4yfAvOrDLYdsKuDIIQo9 FPRzKCZn3R29+rz2ILkejWxrsIh87NJ9hE37woz1k9niGw3KX75AWEC/7odA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1669299225; x=1669385625; bh=QVgQ4dibSCCI/fCOFR5evm3MELuw VX9Yz/keqyRdQfI=; b=TEekU9lYhmDzBab2IHPhX1ahVRYPcl+moN8XQTVYOs3L rhiyGMAJnYZshLiVlgvBS3bvzzVEC0K57WTmBdeYY+AswfCWcIszZ7/Bjuec2F08 XL03LqGynrccPJ0dyf5hU8LSbSUQXUQrbiS0OjTlaTbDEmk+xopm7Y1gLtvZO/8E vr6KlMa3m2Sw8xq4EjrYYup8QYsEl6IaNZ6dWjFDH61bsSB3r1ojlqOvDvzLU/Rv nIABspZOmvqIF7lr2w3Omgrq+CipIlvyA99NBCDQKwIiPgacKs1lmkXhLZ0s7n2z T2B6iPJ+vN5uENLzGixM88/MD774gUqu1i9j7N8EWg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:GXx_YwNHBauVrO2xyvqlKVtYELd5WQg45PIL3OOPmdmXZJbnh_G2VQ> <xme:GXx_Y28KxueGX0QF89a1Isz4Zb50N6HijJkkkpPgj7aHbRfDfbEJHBHMW86EUpiqL jMPmcxzHNG2tBSNnH4>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvgedrieefgdeifecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtre dtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdevhhhrihhsthhophhhvghrucghohhougdfuceotggrfies hhgvrghpihhnghgsihhtshdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptdffueelveefle ehlefffffgleffjefhkeetudfhueelheetjeehvdffgffhueelnecuffhomhgrihhnpehg ihhthhhusgdrtghomhdpihgvthhfrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenuc frrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheptggrfieshhgvrghpihhnghgsihhtshdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:GXx_Y3SDZnRl_QUhfjMl7YE_SSIQARri7gRNSxifWgwXsH_XB8F1jw> <xmx:GXx_Y4uck7VRl_YN5NgeJ0vqkJyasy6qxUcGCme3yweZLnPH4PI3-w> <xmx:GXx_Y4dN5gSK4nexcLeqSPB8CF_WCeu_CR0quNxww1n1QMs8bRhhrg> <xmx:GXx_YypviP900MAiVV8A4RrtMQXW_h1UNyqSgfUbP_JvSsg-nOPsiw>
Feedback-ID: i2f494406:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id A45D4234007E; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 09:13:45 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-1115-g8b801eadce-fm-20221102.001-g8b801ead
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <7ef8405b-b302-47f6-91c4-56626a9cbac6@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0b139b49-1ee4-4f62-ab5d-ec562cfca9a6@betaapp.fastmail.com>
References: <166862348898.27211.16338265887689375983@ietfa.amsl.com> <797875861.71155.1668701339665@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com> <6c471c16-2196-4e08-84a9-cc576ff1a66a@betaapp.fastmail.com> <969393466.92459.1669201799615@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <0b139b49-1ee4-4f62-ab5d-ec562cfca9a6@betaapp.fastmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 09:13:25 -0500
From: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>
To: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/Ed_Wkzep9c0Hcps8kUStasrmoBY>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Possible IAB Adoption of draft-kpw-iab-privacy-partitioning
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 14:13:53 -0000

Agreed. I filed an issue to track this particular point: https://github.com/intarchboard/draft-obliviousness/issues/35

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022, at 5:54 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022, at 22:09, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
>> The document should state very clearly that the net effect of 
>> these architectures on user privacy will be positive or negative 
>> depending on who is in control of the choice of where the traffic goes. 
>
> That seems actionable, yes.  I might disagree on the finer points as a 
> matter of who becomes responsible for conducting the privacy labour, 
> but that seems like a concrete position.  Thanks.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture-discuss mailing list
> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss