IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arch-d] Treating "private" address ranges specially

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Thu, 01 April 2021 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570523A2241 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 13:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=cwnY/mYm; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=ADYtN2VT
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2iU0QiQ_a7qG for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 13:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67C493A2240 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 13:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EEEA5C0091; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:29:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap10 ([10.202.2.60]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 01 Apr 2021 16:29:02 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :cc:subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=471hBX/jUcyEiI4uVR6/n+uaGiuh Mdm6jdR0KXX1Rxg=; b=cwnY/mYmXoJRKLnsWdM3CyBfcwRZujXV5NLJFKf5xjzj XxA7hj5n9jkMpQ6gSrGoyyNklGVZI6kiRCfmL/yk/EaC47LcQG7YsHVp4MlO+WD9 Q1yhM6DgbyyCuHex20so09kXOjBjIeonDvpihoEDLbNoknS15bZRsV0T+hW1PGsm qXyY8XU55swBGOfCQpWWVzfpyhlYZYy5jgecc4MJFOT2umqt6FK8g9KpaXe3S6xK V1+XEpTo3lAr4+qxCBKCEJo3wPKbnUdgM2ivZB+vth/TycH+jJr1zsU5VI7rhS3F W8Vxiv0dwNBsa+8O5P9kidzP87Ojido4ONqb8pVXkQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=471hBX /jUcyEiI4uVR6/n+uaGiuhMdm6jdR0KXX1Rxg=; b=ADYtN2VTEFXQwOwIeBwXQq S0kK43/8oZm0pIP0VPWg3mEIe41CQBdbtJUNY6nOXdxVg74WDziD3F2dCt7IkgFH lW5+8RC1FZDsl7qkZInb186otbIGtK742SxAU/MDRXPnS6Kg9rGQVQu0Pvp9QX/B uo0CTTqrziedAtoOIZ2TiOBGMfTLvJJsBeAfWpgvvI1NqLIp2ykxoygzEd8t3Itp ZJP7YRnWzJGsYI4684i87Dy69rIaCdHRsS7BBK/xX84LpLYEjGL9HHzoLk8cO/28 a5ouPSo0sGIIV7KfmKeJGeZHfpD9sdBQ2hulZQXSC8NmErwnm+XJz6PAEokt4fOA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:DS1mYPafXnmGPgSekdnI0c_62CYipY8p9n9dEDarJAe6NQUm7oB3sQ> <xme:DS1mYOY7v8MhZ_xgxAU5cDSbgx4QKxNLUB9J3E0ci9bGOnAGYck43P9m7Q5OzBJab mfVzpvBgvz07uUVgrk>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudeigedgudegudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgr rhhtihhnucfvhhhomhhsohhnfdcuoehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedtgefhkeegfffhteefjeekveefteehheelgeehheevleefteef ieekfefgjedvgeenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrh fuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhp hidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:DS1mYB99pcv1P7v6JdWlZZ1VjemUzjrUwLOhuoNsIb4qOkJ9IlrIFA> <xmx:DS1mYFqMV-PsQFvnS_ArlqpoOKYKqbnwIESU_xlEzKwJUndVEh1aXQ> <xmx:DS1mYKpimx8mtBW0AZFgll5IUSYftwTrxctZrbOkBxGNA3bVdMfZFQ> <xmx:Di1mYIHF3POa5FXlNoGlPx_EWhk0ixPqU3Qxw8J5l1AjHK8KjfU0gg>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id E399D4E02B7; Thu, 1 Apr 2021 16:29:01 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-273-g8500d2492d-fm-20210323.002-g8500d249
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <24de9a74-5f57-4328-aa0a-6dab888025d2@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-c8SsHLu+0F3czh8sx2uFnTOZEE_FXZXAAwHsnYxDVVPw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4329d51a-d5ba-45b3-9fb0-6795dc6fccd3@www.fastmail.com> <CAMGpriWA4B8AThNKBOHo-bfAdQ2s5iYv8rBOB7X8UVc5GsqENA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMGpriUJkWYPyw7=oAj_GnGu2J14T3=VZYNWPZtAs870P=x0sg@mail.gmail.com> <a68636c2-5df0-46eb-8147-79ec6a992f8a@www.fastmail.com> <CAMGpriU_L8HbLFX_mMBtBXxy=XOc5BAnYgVR9R8TQO=DPvRD_g@mail.gmail.com> <F59E2FC3-19CE-4D14-9F1C-9F7125D89455@mnot.net> <CAMGpriVJCsird15oBfT=gSDTr59_yf9TkLmOSO7a9DGX0VRjOg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMB2iOA-QaCidJHVN=qqZ8TtPXV=xyfuKh+i44VzZLWG3w@mail.gmail.com> <c88bbb17-4a30-4241-af98-436ddf01ca5c@www.fastmail.com> <CAKKJt-c8SsHLu+0F3czh8sx2uFnTOZEE_FXZXAAwHsnYxDVVPw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2021 07:28:41 +1100
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/FaeX2MxLFcGzF2rKiekEHlWAkuw>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Treating "private" address ranges specially
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2021 20:29:08 -0000

On Fri, Apr 2, 2021, at 02:30, Spencer Dawkins at IETF wrote:
> Those notes are destined to go to W3C, in some way?

This is in response to a request from the TAG for consideration.  It's part of a review they are conducting here: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/572

I've referenced Ted's recent summary in that thread, so I think that the feedback thus far has been received.

I don't think that the TAG would object to receiving more comments there if they add new information, but it seems like most of the key points have been covered already.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email