[arch-d] 2 suggestions from the IAB open meeting

Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu> Thu, 11 March 2021 16:04 UTC

Return-Path: <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5893A1225 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 08:04:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VbXBTDfTstfb for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 08:04:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [131.179.128.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 526713A1393 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 08:04:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D5F160107 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 08:04:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id RqwM0v79nsh6 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 08:04:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB6E160118 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 08:04:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra.cs.ucla.edu
Received: from zimbra.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id xGhFB6Y7K_g2 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 08:04:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.111] (cpe-76-91-255-77.socal.res.rr.com [76.91.255.77]) by zimbra.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFE0C160107 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 08:04:13 -0800 (PST)
From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Message-Id: <FB6B72D1-0E9B-4A05-BBB8-0A7F3FB123FE@cs.ucla.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 08:04:12 -0800
To: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.60.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/JNWZrDm2A9hwXrNsdKOgMaCtt9k>
Subject: [arch-d] 2 suggestions from the IAB open meeting
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:04:53 -0000

I would like to support the following 2 suggestions I heard from today’s open meeting

1/ setting up a separate mailing list for discussions on adm/liaison  related issues.  
This would leave arch-discuss just for technical arch issues as its name called.

2/ looking into a workshop on internet centralization/decentralization.

I agree with the comments that extended discussions are needed on the topic, and see the workshop preparation could serve as a drive for focused discussions.

If a workshop is to be planned, IAB might start with an open agenda and solicit inputs from the broader community, e.g. what topics (and sub-topics) to be consider for the agenda

Lixia

PS: I would also like to take opportunity to clarify one of my text comment at the IAB open meeting: 
My comment is something like “protocol designs are what we do. The real question is what kinds of protocols we design”

I saw a couple responses like “but IAB can be a lot more than that (protocol designs)” — of course.  My comment was only on the protocol design part.