IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arch-d] ETSI launches new group on Non-IP Networking addressing 5G new services

Alexander Pelov <a@ackl.io> Thu, 09 April 2020 10:29 UTC

Return-Path: <alexander@ackl.io>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CF23A02BE for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 03:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VxkL5c_EDUUH for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 03:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x133.google.com (mail-il1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1E403A03EA for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 03:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x133.google.com with SMTP id a6so9773431ilr.4 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 03:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ackl-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=UtuRgQ5Bck3ZJUc9M8utAvJjnHRrbovk+2ZfCNqfT+0=; b=1Etfg1gzAZCDLc31mFmlG7niL7jWne7TxCDvrJgA/f2ydg2AXylqTO9E4ElI4512Ny 5HbyLlWCIsETwVU3p8bHa2I+JHL0HEln/GQ0tEMMN8l00gdAUxSjFa5YNjwXkwBpSchb Bjo3loEyWIu6uAjTVLYdH/6LXsBPfE1I2ly5SNIq+gQfAxWIj0D9eeIK1uWJdo8ZsYug 0CeSHSV8xtA6XIb89NaYdZmMp16NZ4cIOE+pnrslYgRoW4MP8uvPwZ5MKOqXsybd4wx7 rD1d6D2B35tqKC0YTYwGRrS6pRivxB1c0cfXVR6oNkj0g2uXNxAZvv4kxlgL4wuRRewO eYHQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=UtuRgQ5Bck3ZJUc9M8utAvJjnHRrbovk+2ZfCNqfT+0=; b=bkEi1u6zn7e0jQwCI99ahr1LpkqNP1adnnJQKA0iO61TIIqZCmuHv1Et8o29EgTVFF o8URJPtxEiSRPar+hDqCs+5C3yKz3+UYWqSW7pCXE7Wvh7hAS19N1biQ7NkCqpmsUeLS gmjRn8cKxXp+GbSw8kHGc49VUQBJs1qnmc8x5KdEkiNxg1aQiMhqngm9AMTz2kmcnEb0 G7RBdAr6DlLj0zl6N2VJsdzxaJ072h9XRE8/lAuXDPB8ecQdA50kx9x/jSXsNoNwZKh2 AnOSKQq6G03oT3V2ORFc0m491ngS7CwoqdfvY6rs1MCqeOw9hnDCVHCaT39M5o6zyHtb eCug==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuY9y7P9kITgdJhJ0BqJHiwNbcL8jUlXl6rdgDLSFaLj2eCvthIR rJlmg8gqF8u/lxaiIAmniaDpX9N1ZXjS5/NJ/BAnIQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypI8C6+26GPl76QsP0Q+dglnDtCt+0YuhChmTksdhWmhe+BYh4X4+vMYOaf/e02AhJx2iJ3SpGtZQ544Ss+xaBo=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:aa87:: with SMTP id p7mr4093475ill.63.1586428153998; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 03:29:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <60a10451-5fbd-fcec-5389-7a72870dcc84@gmail.com> <6A3A4410-A889-46C7-8FD5-7C5AA85486A1@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <6A3A4410-A889-46C7-8FD5-7C5AA85486A1@tzi.org>
From: Alexander Pelov <a@ackl.io>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 12:28:34 +0200
Message-ID: <CACQW0ErRPTDCzA-Grw=79cCqoRN6Xh-ir-W4YN758---c=xDsA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000094ca8705a2d91653"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/JhDY6u9FoTV8lBhxX8yyeK7vaak>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] ETSI launches new group on Non-IP Networking addressing 5G new services
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 10:29:17 -0000

Dear Carsten, all,

Thanks for the pointer and the interesting discussion!
I think one additional point was not yet mentioned regarding the Non-IP
architecture. In LPWANs you have essentially this, and the goal of SCHC
(RFC-to-be-8724) is exactly that - having IP-over-NonIP. There is even a
draft on SCHC-over-NBIOT.

What would be the way to make sure the ETSI people are aware that they can
have the benefits of the Non-IP approach, all without losing compatibility
with the Internet?

Cheers,
Alexander



On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 7:00 AM Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:

> On 2020-04-08, at 06:58, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > All our troubles will soon be over, apparently:
> >
> >
> https://www.etsi.org/newsroom/press-releases/1749-2020-04-etsi-launches-new-group-on-non-ip-networking-addressing-5g-new-services
>
> … and you can find one thoughtful piece of discussion from the IETF chair
> at the unlikely place of
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1677/
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture-discuss mailing list
> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email