Re: [arch-d] ETSI Liaison Work
Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Sun, 28 June 2020 07:46 UTC
Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37833A07A8 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 00:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ryXRWFlYr9Lx for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 00:46:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd30.google.com (mail-io1-xd30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 271B93A0B92 for <architecture-discuss@iab.org>; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 00:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd30.google.com with SMTP id y2so14027996ioy.3 for <architecture-discuss@iab.org>; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 00:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=GRSzwoRFmgRGwB4y19s1IwcNuNW938l/5THP1aWmczY=; b=OpkcwOGt0SvzgATrww4mC6dLNDx0ClbAiLat3esINrlqOueTtA5hnPJqARFPehd0sR oCUZck/VIqHSKD1QQKwkzUL+z0Xd9cHIJmDKWM5OGMC46zjHSQha4ab+WgaTpKvAaQma +5OlqwX4hLyxFIwOlFxxrZ/4ERs+8Zre6zN6tj6fiykJk/8dOOLwfJL2Q/WW9vcV/MkB jNFdvaMZckkXFXWDUFUC4h0UeHlKOH0mlTCTorcr0pVU0FvTEyYPf7B/G4lQ63JXC6/+ HenIy+eU3sxIqKMWIIe1U5CPisKSVT+i9d1WqFcXlyxKH5OyHd0RsJW/uz8a1BqhATab 0KhA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=GRSzwoRFmgRGwB4y19s1IwcNuNW938l/5THP1aWmczY=; b=M+eW+3nZQBVniD3vos0g9P9r/YEav5hbpj6nF5edhEckw0Gk6dAgpnOgAURHuYu4pd 9CBsNa4p52OAw/a3+TdoPlFccAwAuvT+x7K/6x4fWs4uneVnKHXzqaR08ySVUaFu0CKc py+pRCQ481OiWYWqOhh1+9wuxwgi1ijh9YCM/w3J2mgUx3TCsrM2J3T8K9J9VRoIaWIe P6VolE584wCLz8YV8GeSULYZB55oEuUH6X0vb+MzijfW7zm2NEkN3RGHHv0KstjG2tED RvHCtvo6E7if0Oxu4f9gdb18fa4R0QtsdY39+cInXMOEqnB1tsQACVHYZusggvfBsGQG UkNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532lbBTljGpKxy0PapCmRxqTOaYIw0J/h575sbyBRbxtYY6GAgpG 3gt/U8DvBmSU4ssjlagBxrfpEUFfER4Q1/kXZes=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxeuHwGHlOE++WMA6tcBgsGl0FDe8PmlZdVJaNYZ63ATQEkuhoRshcToNyBim/iHH5al1u8ZnTkDOEExfNxQew=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:7818:: with SMTP id p24mr12287572jac.131.1593330394165; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 00:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6SwT2MV-wg5ZA25_Z-iPReX6YZKzPUifBk+-G7js8iFgtw@mail.gmail.com> <89DB0039-690F-4486-8752-CE40AFF146C4@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <89DB0039-690F-4486-8752-CE40AFF146C4@gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 00:46:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SwpH=jme8BYud3W8uhEVorad_w3pSRN9gEUE0YGdRWn5g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, architecture-discuss@iab.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002773e105a92024ae"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/LkIb67jtmjg59OsGmSxAjQnGU_Y>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] ETSI Liaison Work
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 07:46:37 -0000
On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 12:43 AM Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > Besides the fact that liaisons have been IAB territory for ages? > This is a great response. thanks, Rob
- [arch-d] ETSI Liaison Work Rob Sayre
- Re: [arch-d] ETSI Liaison Work Fred Baker
- Re: [arch-d] ETSI Liaison Work Rob Sayre
- Re: [arch-d] ETSI Liaison Work Paul Hoffman
- Re: [arch-d] ETSI Liaison Work Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [arch-d] ETSI Liaison Work Rob Sayre
- Re: [arch-d] ETSI Liaison Work Guntur Wiseno Putra
- Re: [arch-d] ETSI Liaison Work Rob Sayre
- [arch-d] 答复: ETSI Liaison Work Lizhenbin
- [arch-d] 答复: ETSI Liaison Work Lizhenbin
- Re: [arch-d] ETSI Liaison Work BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
- Re: [arch-d] ETSI Liaison Work Alexandre Petrescu