Re: [arch-d] A Public Option for the Core

Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> Wed, 12 August 2020 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04ADA3A11E8 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OFL6ARIQ_DOK for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx43-out1.antispamcloud.com (mx43-out1.antispamcloud.com [138.201.61.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5311B3A11BE for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xse105.mail2web.com ([66.113.196.105] helo=xse.mail2web.com) by mx168.antispamcloud.com with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1k5ssI-000EgH-RZ for architecture-discuss@ietf.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 17:41:17 +0200
Received: from xsmtp21.mail2web.com (unknown [10.100.68.60]) by xse.mail2web.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BRYjL2X02z429m for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.5.2.18] (helo=xmail08.myhosting.com) by xsmtp21.mail2web.com with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1k5soQ-0003Er-85 for architecture-discuss@ietf.org; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:37:10 -0700
Received: (qmail 17318 invoked from network); 12 Aug 2020 15:44:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.1.107]) (Authenticated-user:_huitema@huitema.net@[172.58.35.190]) (envelope-sender <huitema@huitema.net>) by xmail08.myhosting.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with ESMTPA for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; 12 Aug 2020 15:44:24 -0000
To: Scott Shenker <shenker@icsi.berkeley.edu>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
References: <6F47F8A6-CE4D-46B4-852C-702B9B8A5724@eggert.org> <c80bdd1e-eeac-534d-7d2e-e1b04c9144c8@gmail.com> <47EBBED2-2FE9-42B3-BD37-C81DA84A42F8@icsi.berkeley.edu>
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Autocrypt: addr=huitema@huitema.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEXtavGxYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdA1ou9A5MHTP9N3jfsWzlDZ+jPnQkusmc7sfLmWVz1Rmu0 J0NocmlzdGlhbiBIdWl0ZW1hIDxodWl0ZW1hQGh1aXRlbWEubmV0PoiWBBMWCAA+FiEEw3G4 Nwi4QEpAAXUUELAmqKBYtJQFAl7WrxsCGwMFCQlmAYAFCwkIBwIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgEC F4AACgkQELAmqKBYtJQbMwD/ebj/qnSbthC/5kD5DxZ/Ip0CGJw5QBz/+fJp3R8iAlsBAMjK r2tmyWyJz0CUkVG24WaR5EAJDvgwDv8h22U6QVkAuDgEXtavGxIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEHQJoM 6MUAIqpoqdCIiACiEynZf7nlJg2Eu0pXIhbUGONdAwEIB4h+BBgWCAAmFiEEw3G4Nwi4QEpA AXUUELAmqKBYtJQFAl7WrxsCGwwFCQlmAYAACgkQELAmqKBYtJRm2wD7BzeK5gEXSmBcBf0j BYdSaJcXNzx4yPLbP4GnUMAyl2cBAJzcsR4RkwO4dCRqM9CHpVJCwHtbUDJaa55//E0kp+gH
Message-ID: <3702d78d-87d9-ac56-6a45-4aa8a0483b5b@huitema.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:37:13 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <47EBBED2-2FE9-42B3-BD37-C81DA84A42F8@icsi.berkeley.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: en-US
X-Originating-IP: 66.113.196.105
X-Spampanel-Domain: xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-Spampanel-Username: 66.113.196.105/32
Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=66.113.196.105/32@xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Class: unsure
X-Spampanel-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.15)
X-Recommended-Action: accept
X-Filter-ID: Mvzo4OR0dZXEDF/gcnlw0X2OOYwfFINEXkW0Te3GMuqpSDasLI4SayDByyq9LIhVUZbR67CQ7/vm /hHDJU4RXkTNWdUk1Ol2OGx3IfrIJKywOmJyM1qr8uRnWBrbSAGDsYLBcJLyHnVrULITPs15U6ts NHuRxlWqWR9fNqLY1ai4Dcwf+CZK8NXgy3In+fX7STxj9vMdY81nbjTbhBHxwVO05s+oip5EC/YK rMQ9+O9t+TYaqvvx766D6vBkj4PutP0Dzal8myJ8vVhoWnSKP2MRQY4sL7fGBhvCp6oW0F28pnvZ XWSe7jV34Pxn0vH1Lz/y+awqhw7CmTPsWtYsCV/oEQh3zFZ7AJOfdc5NLopVCPmS+MVojfDUugvn Zl+jhHQOLtWk4clq0P6Ltvr/5Zl+BJt+8hYKwgejR0Z9YPn97p3CKmEi95YYeXPNWMiahaC2TJpF rGrq1WX76kTmg5w7R2/M+XaT5BLifEp8KpWu41J1t4cteGI4vH6PuMQp0kaOEXLuWd+6zLg4wp8u XxPcpGyeyPXKNTABBN67jV7JvFCbAD7w3FUirQwmJIqD2OUMeHyTpNN0eXybX/w7/3ZCM0u5uBlK VwmNWN494pWaZ30sdVozPGNttYaP6Q9/2E4JvzZwv3PGBEOc6AcTtNsXDz8en/EE5Mu5lEzai0nS Xv2CmOR0Wfx2I86r3bYPVD1XJsdUC/l4in++svwYCrDy/+Q1ZTVfbcn/dRwQvYbymNgFzWRkuRvd 2hsh/DKjJTkETFTHdBwnk7JDmeUy/EyWiuIoV9YoAM9dq9BlFcU14O9uIBc4R2FHvu2iptL18h43 FQgqqVyFj3sBZx4mEk4vidrAbzPztKfs4s5XguL2uhT3KQx41zCmSSvPnIYm5nmJl5dvo1wdXBOh afnvDu3E7PNP9hZ2YPyDLCAHXnUsy647Mn0zwmGzAi3Zn+Ydr38cN0L29hpYqOQomv/Sn4OJCdFr QGG66XtzjgLUDW/OzgRwsx26JIrnuz41QdUugEEc+Eql4Tj+X3YkLe5buSZuZ5OAUoGBziSYFLZu u6wUZYupFCxOQUA2Zz77xVbE
X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine11.antispamcloud.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/NCPj6DOgYMfXuuMCwoCbMPTVe_k>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] A Public Option for the Core
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:41:25 -0000

On 8/12/2020 6:19 AM, Scott Shenker wrote:
> The world of today is very different from what it was in 1995, particularly in terms of the market forces at work. We discuss our reasoning for why our proposal might become a reality later in the paper (in a section called “Are We Crazy?”), and I would be interested in your reaction. Do you think the market forces we identify might lead to a different result now?

The market forces are leading to the "hollowing of the core". Last time
I checked, over 50% of the top Internet servers were served by a dozen
or less top ASes, belonging to large CDN or large content hosters, both
of which may well be providing their edge points and delivery networks.
Your paper does not address that.

It seems that you are very concerned with market players using access to
"the core" as a choke point to enforce their own version of "pay to
play". This has been an issue a few years ago, but I am not sure it is
an issue now. What I see instead is local ISP making arrangements like
"zero rating" with large content providers. This is a play with local
access bandwidth, not with core transit bandwidth.

We also have evidence of local ISP prioritizing access to Facebook,
YouTube or Netflix without any commercial arrangement with these content
providers. Apparently, the reasoning is that "ISP quality" is measured
by the populace as "can I easily stream this popular content", and so
ISPs use tricks to improve delivery of the most popular content and
compete with other ISPs. (I remember these discussions as part of the
MARNEWS workshop.) That kind of feedback loop is not affected by the
state of core transit.

>
> More generally, as an academic working on issues related to the Internet, I view it as my mission to identify designs and paradigms that would make for a better Internet, and to explore whether there are plausible paths to such eventualities. We recognize that our proposed change is a long-shot. In fact, almost all attempts to effect large-scale changes in the Internet (whether its design or its structure) are likely to fail.   My responsibility as a researcher is to not let that stop me, and my mission as a member of the Internet community is to try to make such changes happen, despite great odds. I hope that people on this list and elsewhere read this paper in that spirit.

Bravo! But then, what about a public option for the edge?

-- Christian Huitema