Re: [arch-d] [I18n-discuss] Closing the list

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Wed, 13 May 2020 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC293A08FC; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S2fwP0WI3Hok; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bird.elm.relay.mailchannels.net (bird.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA4053A08F6; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:31:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF83B700747; Wed, 13 May 2020 20:31:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a27.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-6-17.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.6.17]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 91C9E701520; Wed, 13 May 2020 20:31:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a27.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.18.8); Wed, 13 May 2020 20:31:19 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Juvenile-Madly: 455f447679b7d06a_1589401879483_2000263243
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1589401879483:778835782
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1589401879483
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a27.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a27.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9263804ED; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=pzmfX0SctmZ+Un 2w5YX8rL1uJqY=; b=Oaw5bEaGmy8mW8XSHnTO4WrLOzA+TJSMwcs2dxd4He6H9W mLFblKzq6S/qMEydkWYPCcriBSYfs+m+2KmCCeatnhSk7cI4P+5KVwp195RFq0Z4 NDE/991k/Dj5P9qWyMHIY1zHG2CWA4pv2wRAqJDNcm32OPAiTCwentcIgiWq0=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a27.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D92B804FE; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 15:31:09 -0500
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a27
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, art-ads@ietf.org, architecture-discuss@ietf.org, i18n-discuss@iab.org
Message-ID: <20200513203107.GK18021@localhost>
References: <0114D1C5-49AE-46C8-9AD9-AF30C9D13E91@puck.nether.net> <000A12D4443F2DC47E555650@PSB> <7D8E5CED-FAA5-423B-899C-EDD0D7ED970E@puck.nether.net> <20200513195459.GJ18021@localhost> <20200513201934.GB1417010@puck.nether.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200513201934.GB1417010@puck.nether.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -100
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrleeggddugeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpffftgfetoffjqffuvfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjfgesthdtredttdervdenucfhrhhomheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpefftdektefhueetveeigfefgeejteejvdfhhefgvddtfeeujeehleeguefhgffhgfenucfkphepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopehlohgtrghlhhhoshhtpdhinhgvthepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfedprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmpdhnrhgtphhtthhopehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhm
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/OAEBQEwagjOBo-7CYSOPlD3yqmY>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] [I18n-discuss] Closing the list
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 20:31:26 -0000

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 04:19:34PM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 02:55:00PM -0500, Nico Williams wrote:
> > The note about the list closing, without a reason being given, was a bit
> > jarring.  Anyways, we do need a list.  It could be as simple as creating
> > a new one @ietf.org if we really don't want this one @iab.org.
> 
> 	I think the reason was a bit vague in my note, but the criteria we used
> to review were:
> 
> a) last activity of list
> b) related to prior IAB workshops/activities
> c) list was IAB sponsored
> 
> 	We found many lists that were not used and this one fell through the
> cracks in my steps to send out notes.  If the community want it left open
> I personally don't think anyone will object.

I suspected as much.  Thanks!