IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arch-d] ETSI launches new group on Non-IP Networking addressing 5G new services

Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com> Wed, 08 April 2020 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EF63A1609 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 12:22:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K6ZI0aETiYuD for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 12:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1034.google.com (mail-pj1-x1034.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1034]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E69A53A160A for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 12:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1034.google.com with SMTP id l36so237016pjb.3 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 12:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=dlyqTH6/ybywIHxuaRW79uxgJOFPNAYJVMSvvDLqWtc=; b=FgoZaQLaXYtTvAShPcNfZ+7BcW/Azb6MdADdFKToL/SFS0mYtPGpcZp8PjDG9lQS5h MB1KeqRibgHOI8lVotVHFih6YYAw4914Xbsg558cykc5syQBZN1aJZD+4qc7z7y14oOj 2AQCww4Cw19Gh8wDZUXr/F0SMway6xF4osG1EZ2ABHnvSAKAd3NrH/1hELkZATwrBvbw t9Pc3OpB2gJn4GAKDxYadnHbGVs/FyOT7IxGj/nYd2SJRavvN3YN9wNYzUzErDVVCp+0 n7nublMsUAUBcP2tyh473L86IwaaWzwEtYhlx+Wwx+dq7SAbj59J4LuXkznOEfBMuql0 12PQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=dlyqTH6/ybywIHxuaRW79uxgJOFPNAYJVMSvvDLqWtc=; b=sh7BS7QauXBTiC3aB9ywFcIxgiPHg6WNtzWaKcg8Rrprg4RRAmbEYl4U1KhI2SI7GI 2ZIiBAujfrbr/3j1IrAkJ8CyVxJz0rQMHA+W+V9eA0gawejOWVhy8ThGSQHdXNafIXkT WSmWrHXFjkaiNoFHg14C+j4Ww6tIJ64C39eiJk5mqZMSalJJSV0lalJ+Slk40WmBPef0 3LU+szwMVnue0Y64SpfXs6EQqfdr/HauJr9c81HI1D/MC3KK2NwimegTSRa4lqCZRdui K3unNgnkoORc1IV/QfSznHSR15zflwPP+IEWJi2F3WxNa5bBHWxTzZ2dho5i6xIF+bgW 7wPg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYZXqO6K53PKIPkQ3HvTktRYHZ7G14ZnDfh2k9CtaRINe0VDQG6 0bOwPgxKZIG/JnaBWi8Z4wn22/grk5s=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKehiNnveQWh+Mf0JXvEpSZO7FHMwXD6/uip6EKT8x7UDfuI6uEPrdr1ItCF8MECwo2IX1WyA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:cb14:: with SMTP id z20mr6911439pjt.170.1586373759288; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 12:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.95.81.208] ([162.210.129.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i2sm17288897pfr.203.2020.04.08.12.22.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Apr 2020 12:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <D5BA7A14-1E99-4F78-8B3D-BDBCCD0DCEFF@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7EA94B09-051D-450B-A62A-339385033CEF"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 12:22:37 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CAPv4CP8TYfhr1MjPdJ3B3prmTUS4rQi6MMHiDKJhehya-RaHiw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
To: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
References: <60a10451-5fbd-fcec-5389-7a72870dcc84@gmail.com> <3F26D0A8-28DE-4F35-B4B9-2346A8AED46F@gmail.com> <CAPv4CP8TYfhr1MjPdJ3B3prmTUS4rQi6MMHiDKJhehya-RaHiw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/PQyt12C085vY7yBoH4b76c2k5SA>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] ETSI launches new group on Non-IP Networking addressing 5G new services
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 19:22:41 -0000

> So ... we will get this, with IP and associated protocols layered over it, and all the applications over that. 


Which is exactly fine.  We cannot stop them from creating overlays and as long as they are an overlay, they do not pervert the base architecture.
If they do come up with something interesting, we’ll be able to integrate it.

Tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email