Re: [arch-d] The Internet Architecture for Pandemics/Emergencies/Crises

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 09 May 2020 20:03 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76473A114C for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 May 2020 13:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.451
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.451 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1536-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=iecc.com header.b=vH3hw/t+; dkim=fail (1536-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=taugh.com header.b=MfCOwDie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DJ_K50kJOu6t for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 9 May 2020 13:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 557213A114A for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 May 2020 13:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 4214 invoked by uid 100); 9 May 2020 20:03:49 -0000
Date: 9 May 2020 20:03:48 -0000
Message-ID: <r972b4$439$1@gal.iecc.com>
From: "John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com>
To: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:cleverness; s=106d.5eb70ca4.k2005; i=news@user.iecc.com; bh=7bCem9rdIwIFXadIFOSgNDUIagLu55oN80Gf5QSjuhY=; b=vH3hw/t+Ymg6br+TsorQqD57S6tski6+ikpTW9/2ZfF1wz6fAi2BJBqx6GGdZlSyjQYbWQfE4BtACtOuNutAgI5qBJANWzunYcJAdbLEbGvVXBSffFO/hqjYfj+ZYdZmGQiFzMXwzuwTYv17kppXrHimCt0XkZwP1D7ENcl8Cc86QALx6i7rFnKd3w4zIugZVscDzOVd97OjIjcIBZzzGtLYu2f3uO98pfS/9pOKAf0PVSCSrfWSj4BCKr/UBfqw
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:cleverness; s=106d.5eb70ca4.k2005; olt=news@user.iecc.com; bh=7bCem9rdIwIFXadIFOSgNDUIagLu55oN80Gf5QSjuhY=; b=MfCOwDieDDGvA761e0dS5t9BIAQ51oFYt4AAi5+7sd3TSLxrGlgXucKvN21UwXFRaXy06dhp2eKZZA/u5/s9Y/46sp+A4MbX+Ojigvmgb/6b3/sWCNxC/eXyfsc7BVv+5iU1FpHln6TArziWTWaxX6hsrcxkekJijfHJYRJfipIYXREG2N65JPylSfWkB5IN+0xBOvH6qjmDNb/kT9PPSv0Doj97EVlkVacTa/isx+nT/sq5/IkUEKer5B5gQ7gs
Organization: Taughannock Networks
References: <CAKi_AEtez4BsCbNJ=avUC6bPhz8uXuttBQ_BRQu7izNXiEs6qA@mail.gmail.com> <20200508153318.GK62020@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAKi_AEtez4BsCbNJ=avUC6bPhz8uXuttBQ_BRQu7izNXiEs6qA@mail.gmail.com> <20200508153318.GK62020@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Cleverness: some
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: johnl@iecc.com (John Levine)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/QmTSuiRzFj6LowRrD6B8ZS-wxUM>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] The Internet Architecture for Pandemics/Emergencies/Crises
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 May 2020 20:03:53 -0000

In article <20200508153318.GK62020@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>de>,
Toerless Eckert  <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
>... to me the ISOC call for proposals looks like
>very much baked to favour established administrative entities (must be
>able to have track record to manage the money). Aka: I fear it will
>exclude core technical innovators that have not managed to build up
>a bureaucracy large enough to deal with money that way. Too bad.
>
>Managing the money is a service that ISOC should be able to provide
>to innovators.

I expect it won't be a surprise to hear that since the ISOC foundation
is in the U.S., it has to follow U.S. law.

Also, 501(c)(3) is not very difficult to qualify for.  There are over
a million registered non-profits in the U.S., and while a few are
large, 75% of them have annual budgets under $50K.

-- 
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly