Re: [arch-d] A Reading on "Cosmos", "Technics" and "Politics"

Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com> Mon, 17 February 2020 04:09 UTC

Return-Path: <gsenopu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F0D1200F4 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 20:09:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GP75xHRRgwFH for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 20:09:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22d.google.com (mail-oi1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EA5712001A for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 20:09:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id c16so15486667oic.3 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 20:09:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dVTKMgc6p2pG8qyzLtjzj28xe1uN8kLbqx/+rTRH/kU=; b=rEARkT7nX+FdW9W7AkyBKU0wwvzrNMI63WjuD7HXbCndJwgPaUmUjWodpzhkO7ISxl jnwIeFbBXL0if30o8HCO2LlqSFYHEBMoXq+88g+HK/RAHnArZJySIPBpYcKaOQbUTNjG FSqpSpAEfBztR3TuPx5ZvAolozthkGWW2fIlAiwkR5fyb9xKMvSPHOmetCINRELjsP3+ 5WQBBMsMe6MYCY+ToabL39H4D9y4TUmWe1Nib+ocq99eyr7XO78Ft0zlY0ESNLHjyXRF 9LLnB+wm/Uq8un9ltSVvjy96nqR2SGn93GekheFPC4Ud4aCXuL4bykXrDlp2wJPaqnuN M0aA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=dVTKMgc6p2pG8qyzLtjzj28xe1uN8kLbqx/+rTRH/kU=; b=GH+nYSFOPbKmeo1ayMkWWAuvluFP0cZoJ/TRQQgjF4OayvHCscO092uk/SX07D5OfB PZKE3Sos4ajtz2jZhHtG2q4ppWmtHyfnlDIZwm+MHcCkP1RSurcvvccOWvZnbqY6Gz6z rJd00XRFqlIfTSNFBbf9m45Q+RweTYTsWZC7EXsc+zR31ojmeoflF7XKN+R1cNaoJTKM eJBFrCxoqgVRxbVPznBjk3FvyKep80NgKAyvZMbILZQj7FSmJBVhIc0ZNC/9F8zT9mss /qfJk+Fu4Y2dlfftnMQw309y85u73GJNp3iDT3EKzlywZhDgf7NN0CnCV6UugCfZBWwo E9Gw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV3aydei46EEZwXA7wfoPoDnuG8i9EYR/IFPoMfGezOn64UgN19 /9zzVjYhv1QI340LxFegUT7+MqqEVZYv3IMbrKCFIA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzn762gxML/0uTx+ieNqUV871OKzL3aeOAcxPc7BA8RSZlJMjHC/OULIfw3mBP/BqJ00Q4IMTgW7lVuQQAt9cY=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:f354:: with SMTP id r81mr8502673oih.90.1581912580607; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 20:09:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1155:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 20:09:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAKi_AEtFAjk1xmqAvzWJn+-w6or0A39h_phm=v1NQKGeKvt0vA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKi_AEtFAjk1xmqAvzWJn+-w6or0A39h_phm=v1NQKGeKvt0vA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 11:09:40 +0700
Message-ID: <CAKi_AEt6JGBDVFFnzPvfV2auZs=2+00r6HCC4kd7_SdcrKhf4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "architecture-discuss@ietf.org" <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006ed1b1059ebdb9aa"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/R0q0PfYMtrlfQPDTLRdoWOnS0Ho>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] A Reading on "Cosmos", "Technics" and "Politics"
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 04:09:43 -0000

Dear architecture-discuss,

I finded also "The Genesis of Technicity" referring to (the book) "On the
Mode of Existence of Technical Objects" --both were published in 2017:


"...

This study postulates that technicity is one of the two fundamental phases
of the mode of existence of the whole constituted by man and the world.1 ...

...".








https://www.e-flux.com/journal/82/133160/the-genesis-of-technicity

Simondon, Gilbert, "The Genesis of Technicity", E-Flux journal #82 - Mei
2017


Regard,
Guntur Wiseno Putra

Pada Minggu, 16 Februari 2020, Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com>
menulis:

> Dear architecture-discuss,
>
> I finded a reading on "cosmos", "technics" and "politics" published in
> 2017:
>
> It was said, by Yuk Sui that there were the end of unilateral
> globalization and the arrival of anthropocene driving such possibillity to
> talk about "cosmopolitics" as a commercial regime and as politics of nature.
>
> Then it was said, "...    §3. Cosmotechnics as CosmopoliticsI propose to
> go beyond the notion of cosmology; instead, it would be more productive to
> address what I call cosmotechnics. Let me give you a preliminary definition
> of cosmotechnics: it is the unification of the cosmos and the moral through
> technical activities, whether craft-making or art-making. There hasn’t been
> one or two technics, but many cosmotechnics. What kind of morality, which
> and whose cosmos, and how to unite them vary from one culture to another
> according to different dynamics. I am convinced that in order to confront
> the crisis that is before us—namely, the Anthropocene, or the intrusion of
> Gaia (Latour and Stengers), or the “entropocene” (Stiegler), all presented
> as the inevitable future of humanity—it is necessary to reopen the question
> of technology, in order to envisage the bifurcation of technological
> futures by conceiving different cosmotechnics. ...".
>
> Sui, Yuk, "Cosmotechnics as Cosmopolitics", E-flux journal #86, November
> 2017)
>
>
> https://www.e-flux.com/journal/86/161887/cosmotechnics-as-cosmopolitics
>
> Regard,
> Guntur Wiseno Putra
>