Re: [arch-d] ETSI launches new group on Non-IP Networking addressing 5G new services

Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> Thu, 16 April 2020 21:52 UTC

Return-Path: <gih@apnic.net>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31923A11B8 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=apnic.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y0aPiaOpsY_c for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:52:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from APC01-PU1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr1320054.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.132.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 153703A108B for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ME1o0ATHI2kD6aNE0cpZuNZb8LIzfyQ8ym5N45dXTkxkuXrgqL4pqP8yp3EduUqwTVA8lTh2FNDmmiLs27gq25ixg/Jjoji7cBCE9s0aOcO5tjzgXj4e8GqBkOysI0/Ob3CVVjMwKPGFl0MJnNBEplAXUMEbFlKvxPAm33pk7IAiE1JXv9c276mVoz06LtqTz+DEu+RnDpOuAio8RT232TvxvGrT+kX/NZziT9sheqXO1KKJM4G6TjawFTjGl0lINa2lJitBOlYlBaaN9UZm9vtrcfjp218R32wOYwLa+nlSw2DSZvBPsalRqHdPHl0UnlOlerHwvJETxYniCfojYA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ohBY7QJg5fhSf0hVYQ+lxZJoNErAlKGC+vT+Hd1TbF8=; b=iXRpMzPi4aAEG16NVerBDtWVvWFnbUEWbzHaxhNi5g3PDQcz9dI+6RcSiCHBXOuNUQR65xTZyqPr1oBJXpjPR2C3qWEPsGUim+dxy9yrcMla12/uzqeppm089m3v6+ldx+kiDypGCgPp6ECuw4qiQCQMVnpok8aHBaGfoLOGcuDSv+T+uk3hivcImsffGH9u2WSdLVPWzgBNi+XxSCDzA0b4LxGtRXL/TQUXISuCXge8VJyIYHc7e/nkvNcZmwm7GPW6I3DKFgP6w2RosRy2SJ5Yl2vIC03Akcnhi4PYuUdqRX/Sl2XemUKlKf2B5wYaexvl0XCHTMw57Hh78DenXg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=apnic.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=apnic.net; dkim=pass header.d=apnic.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apnic.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ohBY7QJg5fhSf0hVYQ+lxZJoNErAlKGC+vT+Hd1TbF8=; b=FqVrVr84I+OLQaf8IhZRBWgDZ3/wUfsYyIQEUB8HnWwbrx4F+U6ekELJckp4HQavaJ3+E7/C5eOXBu14CwoYSpAQGqo7s0ekdkIgRkcdd4krJi645yHyS7qewOEbl/lywPk9Nqjksj4LMOjOiyLLX6MA2td00n95PhlrKZSt6KQ=
Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=gih@apnic.net;
Received: from HK0PR04MB2756.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com (20.177.25.74) by HK0PR04MB2371.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com (52.133.145.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2900.28; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 21:52:25 +0000
Received: from HK0PR04MB2756.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b09f:3852:b2bd:c8bd]) by HK0PR04MB2756.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b09f:3852:b2bd:c8bd%4]) with mapi id 15.20.2900.028; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 21:52:25 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
From: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <96ea575b-78d5-019d-15b2-abc8e5c8b22e@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 07:52:20 +1000
Cc: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <737F9A7C-C982-4C86-BAAE-8982CA4050F6@apnic.net>
References: <20200408054204.GA6005@nic.fr> <6C2A3533-7F75-45B1-9B51-19938597174B@tzi.org> <20200408194154.GJ28965@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4200C5F8-9F56-4FFF-90F4-7AD76A9F4FC8@eggert.org> <20200409121941.GZ28965@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <C758BDF2-8CD6-4C22-90CA-6ED98DACD740@eggert.org> <20200409175431.GF28965@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <1e89795e-6bd9-2318-aa81-27f8327e1226@gmail.com> <4ac9e9fc-41a3-f458-566e-f0a68d26d9ea@huitema.net> <E029AEC023B1A60E3E956641@PSB> <20200416174840.GL41264@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <96ea575b-78d5-019d-15b2-abc8e5c8b22e@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-ClientProxiedBy: SYXPR01CA0092.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com (2603:10c6:0:2e::25) To HK0PR04MB2756.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:203:34::10)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Received: from 2001-44b8-110b-5100-45a2-8555-7ad5-38a2.static.ipv6.internode.on.net (2001:44b8:110b:5100:45a2:8555:7ad5:38a2) by SYXPR01CA0092.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com (2603:10c6:0:2e::25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2921.26 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 21:52:24 +0000
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:44b8:110b:5100:45a2:8555:7ad5:38a2]
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 530557ce-53ae-4a85-1186-08d7e25072da
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: HK0PR04MB2371:
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <HK0PR04MB23718460AB819F5379D29B3DB8D80@HK0PR04MB2371.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com>
X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:8882;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 0375972289
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:HK0PR04MB2756.apcprd04.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(39840400004)(136003)(376002)(396003)(346002)(366004)(6512007)(186003)(81156014)(66574012)(8676002)(6486002)(6916009)(36756003)(8936002)(2906002)(508600001)(5660300002)(2616005)(33656002)(66476007)(54906003)(53546011)(6506007)(86362001)(16526019)(316002)(4326008)(52116002)(6666004)(66556008)(66946007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: apnic.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: CoZr+0tgUyQ8r9I+AsZ4IUz/Gq+JmxHceF957VHMgi97XLfwqC/4mvgEH6y4/EyNxsFztKpFJL4httXNq8S8+YiFadUH7SFN3spyugLRS3cciTqV3xLLr9Y+1TehM6k4JR5lTuetmJYTHNYAnuWY9vT9MJDDSDiPKxvXEgrb1Qyp5xPPVDDk3Fz4j3Pmor/1/Nv34MTdJ/TKWOJ+YztU+okxdWrV2TbdPWinPo4svNMFY9LXOr4iceHDnalvR58v9rPh/y2mWvOaICOMZCi8QpXyxI7VH4Uvuv4Ho+o0H20ExD6Sfs4ouZQrLOQIimpmXJA/8P620k5HotsSeGXZoakEyfxJwoioQMDjumJD/TWAZQcLQ0j9y1Dbd3kmibjZeIV2ZjMgb3sYFXMDKjpPBtMTn2+VWz+GuQTKGkoLZ/2mLjXUIKokKj1SVI/wARtB
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: sqN77TmNzHTnVjpdeA76hO1IcEy+t14t1pVlDtZLeSc1v9ObEwrjSULX5r+hcB5eqhPq0n/fcWShPoBzQA7Ps1G68xe5QEAiT8npkSRBMfKyWIajWsBH6IRRTeM/2JdXaF70rV7JEZ/PXVp37gz8PIjde+Flteu0TC38IynwdVK0CQ080c7JNJTeETUMwGHFggV/CwJDjCoY7fX1oktFYg==
X-OriginatorOrg: apnic.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 530557ce-53ae-4a85-1186-08d7e25072da
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Apr 2020 21:52:25.0858 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 127d8d0d-7ccf-473d-ab09-6e44ad752ded
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-MailboxType: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-UserPrincipalName: 4yjptb4XNYxkpmTpcle4QQdzAwxPAKz3hxw1JUeCODrpJB6PXQkz01emfN2ZRt1t
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HK0PR04MB2371
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/R7Blnb7JmBTJ4uqJTlt_qdY3pvQ>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] ETSI launches new group on Non-IP Networking addressing 5G new services
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 21:52:31 -0000


> On 17 Apr 2020, at 7:17 am, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 17-Apr-20 05:48, Toerless Eckert wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 02:56:30PM -0400, John C Klensin wrote:
>>> It may also be worth noting that a, perhaps the, major add-on
>>> change in IPv6 --much touted in its early days-- was supposed to
>>> be ubiquitous lP-level encryption.
> 
> Not touted by the IPv6 protagonists,

Evidently you never sat through a Latif Ladid presentation Brian! I heard
many many many stories about how IPv6 and IPSEC was a revolutionary
combination that was going to change the internet, yada yada yada.

> Yes, there was an intention
> to make IPsec mandatory-to-implement, but there was never a claim from the
> IETF that IPv6 with IPsec was intrinsically more secure than IPv4 with IPsec.
> 

Gee, the rooms I was in at the time was full of such wondrous claims. I kinda
wonder which room you were in at the time!

With 20/20 hindsight I’d say the host-centric perspective of IPSEC was comprehensively 
flawed, as the subsequent move in the marketplace for protocols attests.

As for IPv6: extension headers. No more need be said.

Geoff