Re: [arch-d] Possible IAB Adoption of draft-kpw-iab-privacy-partitioning

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Wed, 23 November 2022 22:55 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2745C14F74F for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:55:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=n2n+Ezso; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=b8beGHcM
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IxZAbvZoQAra for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:55:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8DAEC14F692 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:55:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFAC6320090A; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 17:55:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap41 ([10.202.2.91]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 23 Nov 2022 17:55:16 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1669244116; x=1669330516; bh=L2vERueC/8 8qIzAIftROFCxnjjr6laRpJ1adttz9nms=; b=n2n+EzsojRtOEqF5QJwWF/ALmt 6VLI/Fpm9le/849/dSrHNrynARnZLilG0qUal23trO0pnDQaSApbnHqUeu07xqt0 C3PnZLF1FqfvX8Wgp6mYfNOv7xSgsgVSdsf4JjJ4zqgOKlU4dy1B+RJ2TtIHeTiP QTtbq077hU4BWJiB8XC7GajyDN6MSRgVc/rl9IAsKyYnLs+eY8AjswZLV4oqp+ou EFKozyIjg9Y/1rTXbIuryGkjjBRFBkGoX/OQYZn+PX+LEiwOLdTUjCdJw10B3q1e 0GbOkQvi9QVBdMXQNG2Cqbf26Ina445BHe2eJ7MqKoQcSrAOuZ2PZ8pxk0og==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1669244116; x=1669330516; bh=L2vERueC/88qIzAIftROFCxnjjr6 laRpJ1adttz9nms=; b=b8beGHcMMojO1Me4UtMAWGE1PnrvVJu96ma+nGI5hF1d hQFy4xY/MPu9VmoighVCYJMDaE/chlMxYoraKZDyJIwN5W5TCJZGbJCPL4cceKt2 pNXt8LVNlAo1QtILo4lB6IV1CDyfZ430igOtvG22MCkBG1UJSR+cj+h0y8VyVOx5 bDnmEAzxkBwwe0YfeGnKTt9yUumXRX6s15FWAwe/k4dHu/Bk3mGfbeqqsO1BrTCZ z93pQK6QT1pku11NImAE3paauWPSQmajFecDNE4uFQn0jPH4fhPnrPWHeC/MvdZW qcKZH67T44zD3bo6QTKuQQ+6AdretnS0jNC+boG78A==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:1KR-Y_rAFsmQQIoiN-HkcJ4W8QCUfvf7rE2J-dB5ije2QP0dzQ7Clw> <xme:1KR-Y5rifgql6iZrQWRZ5FOscAB0dZujUJCzFPNyAOyjMWJcvB2N3RzGnFYK389XQ hWwee4_Ou7JElOuhCU>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvgedriedvgddtvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgrrhht ihhnucfvhhhomhhsohhnfdcuoehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeekteeuieektdekleefkeevhfekffevvdevgfekgfeluefgvdejjeeg ffeigedtjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhroh hmpehmtheslhhofigvnhhtrhhophihrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:1KR-Y8Mv9eCfzc6hX5Cb-JmxhGlI3ZKIroL2v_mckSWhuDrDb7bh6A> <xmx:1KR-Yy709XcWmjilPmle5zVn_wDLqZWHAvm0Z9f0ZSfMbJT5bZXnCw> <xmx:1KR-Y-4PxkdgtxLv1_W7cFkrURj4OjVvDNCegf0b81q4ZCd0_DQM0w> <xmx:1KR-Y7UOH_--7boSWA9fNX37cKkDeshKLe1yCo5dvjJiPt9fZz2ktQ>
Feedback-ID: ic129442d:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id E85EB234007B; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 17:55:15 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-1115-g8b801eadce-fm-20221102.001-g8b801ead
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <0b139b49-1ee4-4f62-ab5d-ec562cfca9a6@betaapp.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <969393466.92459.1669201799615@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com>
References: <166862348898.27211.16338265887689375983@ietfa.amsl.com> <797875861.71155.1668701339665@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com> <6c471c16-2196-4e08-84a9-cc576ff1a66a@betaapp.fastmail.com> <969393466.92459.1669201799615@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 09:54:56 +1100
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/W_qLeH4u6FGODTcGIWjpY6sicl4>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Possible IAB Adoption of draft-kpw-iab-privacy-partitioning
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 22:55:23 -0000

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022, at 22:09, Vittorio Bertola wrote:
> The document should state very clearly that the net effect of 
> these architectures on user privacy will be positive or negative 
> depending on who is in control of the choice of where the traffic goes. 

That seems actionable, yes.  I might disagree on the finer points as a matter of who becomes responsible for conducting the privacy labour, but that seems like a concrete position.  Thanks.