Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "paper"

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Mon, 11 May 2020 13:25 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D723A0AC5 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2020 06:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=L0KF2RHp; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=BAq2XoD6
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id auMgVn6TENVT for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2020 06:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.yitter.info (mx5.yitter.info [159.203.31.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F7E23A0AB1 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2020 06:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx5.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DFC8BE1BF for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2020 13:25:06 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1589203506; bh=9Ed3/m0V7z60aodRI1a07GbbhsReeBPXjKRi86xGz3U=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=L0KF2RHpzkh5tSHarRC2OTWrpLHr+vPRTsosin7wHO4MHRITxWU1PRtEC/KOt7NjT JRcp+jI6ZTuLFaWZF2S0ts9Mj0FLT4+Ab7WZn+sHGMUp6YSkPI7dT9P26N8wVkjy3b hvGrJafBkVhuoGgExvjfNsYDR+/3ImY7NTPRuRQs=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx5.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx5.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Jbt_JQ9Log6 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2020 13:25:04 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 09:25:03 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1589203504; bh=9Ed3/m0V7z60aodRI1a07GbbhsReeBPXjKRi86xGz3U=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=BAq2XoD6WzNR1nvQ4WJTnO/oPbHNNG8MhXz6ILP9/SfMGc/kTtU9kfBjdCQU3LkFR mnIV/y4VAwgT8tk14/lfjzLpWAqDTcfatHGFBPU2jsav6zIiavbxVxBmAtui6JGHEu OzvzSzNR4AaJcGJ6NzDdPO/2BV03rzuY8MNnEHN0=
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200511132503.fkgsbwt3u4todhzz@crankycanuck.ca>
References: <20200428190608.GN62020@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <d85b5fbc-0379-602d-7c9b-fabfd9cdac58@gmail.com> <20200428211737.GP62020@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <emde06c4fa-b2c1-418c-9f5d-50e5a28bbe6c@desktop-rub0n2r>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <emde06c4fa-b2c1-418c-9f5d-50e5a28bbe6c@desktop-rub0n2r>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/XX6OV4eOcof5Z5OV3WF4I5lO4RM>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "paper"
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 13:25:39 -0000

I'm the CEO of the Internet Society and posting with that hat on, but
from this address out of convenience.

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 09:58:57PM +0000, Ian Peter wrote:

> Perhaps some restrictions were placed on new memberships in these
> circumstances?

I'm replying to this in order to stop such speculation from taking
hold.  There have been no additional constraints on membership of the
internet-policy or any other ISOC list since last November.  The
interface for subscribing is awful because it was added to an
off-the-shelf association membership system.  You need to be a member
of the Internet Society to join its lists due to a side effect of the
way we understand the GDPR to work and our liability under it (it's a
little different for newly-created lists).

Best regards,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com