Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports (was: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-06-11)

Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Tue, 19 May 2020 12:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269DF3A0956; Tue, 19 May 2020 05:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0HPeR84sP_iP; Tue, 19 May 2020 05:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8223::]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D5193A091F; Tue, 19 May 2020 05:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p200300dee7007a00818703b5b143a604.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([2003:de:e700:7a00:8187:3b5:b143:a604]); authenticated by wp513.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1jb1Bt-0007K1-89; Tue, 19 May 2020 14:17:49 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <95025E53-BF51-4D37-8007-ADE2D79A4908@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 14:17:46 +0200
Cc: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D2CBE5C9-A267-4337-9C3B-2213F4350E00@kuehlewind.net>
References: <158920530782.23655.6622928751672901506@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512152625.124c1588@elandnews.com> <d798d383-9bab-50f8-b6ee-dabb9cc37c2a@cs.tcd.ie> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512162358.0b239160@elandnews.com> <4548adba-834c-bfdd-36af-66b367408df8@cs.tcd.ie> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512191150.0bafa9a0@elandnews.com> <9161f68e-f51b-f97b-fc2b-372d24404209@cs.tcd.ie> <CAL0qLwZQxM+eDeZ+zFw3Gny7sy=jXi-1aUvE1B2RuO=M5CP_Sw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512232644.0d9328c8@elandnews.com> <CALaySJKs9oLXBN_UVq=Mn5ZefvrSgPyrV1J=1NMA0=YVDRnJVA@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200513081326.0ababe28@elandnews.com> <CALaySJKG7+g7u4p92axbZx4AxhwZgNfgfeHhE708EVpLs+iJjQ@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200513101502.0b0c7c90@elandnews.com> <CALaySJ++dWefRF5rbc0Fxp6wAFWJJH0rMt9u_5gv9BxN2adKbw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200513140922.0aebf148@elandnews.com> <F3AE398D-7BBF-4187-BEB4-9F3B55463662@kuehlewind.net> <95025E53-BF51-4D37-8007-ADE2D79A4908@gmail.com>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;ietf@kuehlewind.net;1589890685;782070e9;
X-HE-SMSGID: 1jb1Bt-0007K1-89
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/XuQ9PKKf9CT72eekBJUFYeRUshY>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports (was: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-06-11)
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 12:18:15 -0000

Hello Bob,

Thanks for the proposal. I’ll check with the liaison shepherds and the rest of the IAB to make sure we have document the current practice correctly on this page and the IAB liaisons page.

Mirja



> On 18. May 2020, at 17:48, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Mirja,
> 
> I suggest that the page at https://www.iab.org/liaisons/liaison-mgr-reports/ be updated with a note saying that there aren’t periodic reports and reports received are published in the minutes (and a link to the minutes).
> 
> Bob
> 
> 
>> On May 14, 2020, at 2:08 PM, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello S. Moonesamy,
>> 
>> Thanks for pointing this out. It seems that the page was not correctly taken over when the IAB webpage was moved to a new system in 2011. The pages are restored now. However, as you can see and as noticed on the IAB liaison page itself, we don’t have the practice of collecting periodic report anymore, for a while already.
>> 
>> As noted by Wes already, if reports are sent to the IAB or if liaison managers directly report in an IAB meeting, these are noted and published in the minutes instead.
>> 
>> Mirja
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 13. May 2020, at 23:31, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear IAB Chair,
>>> 
>>> I was searching for liaison reports.  Unfortunately, the link on the IAB web site ( https://www.iab.org/liaisons/liaison-mgr-reports/ ) is not working correctly.  I assume that the openness (Section 3.6 of RFC 2850) allows for those reports to be published.  Such reports could be useful information to people responding to IAB requests for comments on the IAB appointments.
>>> 
>>> I would appreciate if the IAB could consider my request to publish all the liaison reports.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> S. Moonesamy
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Architecture-discuss mailing list
>>> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Architecture-discuss mailing list
>> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss
>