Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "paper"
John Grant <j@ninetiles.com> Thu, 30 April 2020 11:23 UTC
Return-Path: <j@ninetiles.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B3B3A0A07 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 04:23:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.717
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.717 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.82, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9QgbsazhhRTA for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 04:22:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from know-smtprelay-omc-6.server.virginmedia.net (know-smtprelay-omc-6.server.virginmedia.net [80.0.253.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14CF83A0A02 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 04:22:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.35] ([79.72.166.100]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPA id U7HMjCfbkEIzOU7HMjB2wo; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 12:22:57 +0100
X-Originating-IP: [79.72.166.100]
X-Authenticated-User: john.s.grant@ntlworld.com
X-Spam: 0
X-Authority: v=2.3 cv=HZs6sBM8 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=KdT9lSvhpbvUFdjzdD3cHA==:117 a=KdT9lSvhpbvUFdjzdD3cHA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=qNp_YjjoAAAA:8 a=le6d79QuAAAA:8 a=pKAOfxU6yZDj6g9ipNUA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=g81M8DewQ1UA:10 a=khMt8xYRSkkA:10 a=GPpaJ-c28cifDO-wfJs0:22 a=QbAMNLWdp4a7deKPGBBn:22
To: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
References: <20200428190608.GN62020@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <d85b5fbc-0379-602d-7c9b-fabfd9cdac58@gmail.com> <096a7bae-3997-5c77-a2c0-4d5911c0c89f@gmail.com>
From: John Grant <j@ninetiles.com>
Message-ID: <0dc78987-2872-8b8e-35f9-0cbdf9675b7e@ninetiles.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 12:23:04 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <096a7bae-3997-5c77-a2c0-4d5911c0c89f@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-GB
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfOFYniZWvsor9Vmmi7OmdfwihOo7af/bCqTtOuY7dzkh6Yk4icB3w1U2QXwo2c3J4osoZuR8Y1jutBIntdZvolx1JImLx81jLF1LZzMV3HEgjOtXJog6 BzeAy90a9hLiHbVFvSrY1SGEdnaMvyQ0q+tLSFBmVCINmxGqYgHVr7yTu8Mi2qmdVoBru17G93TI1g==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/_adaTBBoQyp65th6eyfgk4QiSz8>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "paper"
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:23:02 -0000
On 30/04/2020 06:40, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Where to Discuss a New Internet? > > https://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~brian/InterOmnesNovasRete.html In what way does the NIN press release show that ETSI has blundered? Is it referring to the expectation that NGP could take non-IP into IETF? -- John Grant Nine Tiles, Cambridge, England +44 1223 862599 and +44 1223 511455 http://www.ninetiles.com
- [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "paper" Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Ian Peter
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… John Levine
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Olaf Kolkman
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Olaf Kolkman
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Andrew Campling
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… John Grant
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Andrew Campling
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… John Grant
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Guntur Wiseno Putra
- Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "p… Andrew Sullivan