Re: [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-for-the-users-02> (The Internet is for End Users)

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 06 February 2020 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DFFA1208AF; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 07:04:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nGnm-uvMqNqb; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 07:04:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 341721200CC; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 07:04:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050102.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 016F21Xa026714; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 15:04:32 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=ImjW0it7+4ITj2wdzNzUdM9tVskexM+TGrrNzRskIiA=; b=W4hUax2+mnuElmLLxjDLqO5Z54MLV3gd1yV9WDsJZWkJhMq+Xe1jyEcippvhZ1pT/FRG RwwImTX5DGjM+n0F7Db3PxVXoFxrCuqiFfEwMTrD9lcUBjIF9y6fFjYctY3IYp/9B38n 31R8ioE4/8h/Rq+fqpfhVzHm/YcJRWVPBM6tr67hHniyrfdSRDfp+PdcLnmixJJ7t6MP npo6Cdj/hpLpyIEvExT259jUQTe7FaIKftG8n+eoIc+GeLQe88VVGU9kCeVhCyEQ9gve gufieutjgg+tXaXaE5LdEcnZGM/ZCO1GVVDz9bjjRGa9+kdYYICwvXNCDeqiU/RpynZz cQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint8 (prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com [96.6.114.122] (may be forged)) by m0050102.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2xyhn5qrkk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 06 Feb 2020 15:04:32 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 016F2BOL028892; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:04:32 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.53]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2xykfwd6xm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 06 Feb 2020 10:04:31 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:04:24 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 10:04:24 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "architecture-discuss@ietf.org" <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>, "iab@iab.org" <iab@iab.org>
Thread-Topic: Call for Comment: <draft-iab-for-the-users-02> (The Internet is for End Users)
Thread-Index: AQHV3HZ/I0DaxXiXykeehCHVI1JCW6gORIGA
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 15:04:23 +0000
Message-ID: <B4D53A68-296F-4940-81C0-7ECCF55B4D14@akamai.com>
References: <158094293707.31222.730373457433066701.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <158094293707.31222.730373457433066701.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.22.0.200203
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.116.207]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <42AB02C76FC971498F597D08B15FFAB9@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2020-02-06_01:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=734 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-2002060115
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-02-06_01:2020-02-06, 2020-02-06 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=721 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2002060114
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/blnWrX7PVJzbi70p1gJ1achZYng>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-for-the-users-02> (The Internet is for End Users)
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 15:04:37 -0000

>    The document is being considered for publication as an Informational RFC 
    within the IAB stream, and is available for inspection at:
    <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iab-for-the-users/>
  
The second paragraph of section 4.2 is fatally flawed.  I raised this as an issue on GitHub weeks ago.

	"This leads to Web browsers' interest being better align with those of their user

Baloney.  For some, maybe. But to give all of them coverage as an official IETF document?  No way.