Re: [arch-d] possible new IAB programme on Internet resilience

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Mon, 13 January 2020 14:32 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CA41200D6 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 06:32:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lrHegKlREsG8 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 06:32:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1A94120072 for <architecture-discuss@iab.org>; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 06:32:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D3D728011B; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:32:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 500) id 36ADD2802D6; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:32:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (relay01.prive.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:15::11]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EB8C28011B; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:32:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.tech.ipv6.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B38663E720; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:32:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1F3B8433B4; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:32:00 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:32:00 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Dan York <york@isoc.org>
Cc: Lucy Lynch <llynch@civil-tongue.net>, "architecture-discuss@iab.org" <architecture-discuss@iab.org>
Message-ID: <20200113143200.GA7767@nic.fr>
References: <f13e1588-35e0-2493-93d2-add3480bb207@cs.tcd.ie> <alpine.BSF.2.21.99999.352.1912311910270.24431@hans.rg.net> <7020A5C7-6D06-4D6B-85DD-3FCE9CFC03C7@isoc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <7020A5C7-6D06-4D6B-85DD-3FCE9CFC03C7@isoc.org>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 10.2
X-Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-6-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000167, version=1.2.2
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2019.11.5.63017
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/ctGgf6MRsVYmojaebr1aLfpMrRw>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] possible new IAB programme on Internet resilience
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 14:32:04 -0000

On Wed, Jan 01, 2020 at 06:44:21PM +0000,
 Dan York <york@isoc.org> wrote 
 a message of 480 lines which said:

> For example, at Amazon’s recent re:Invent conference they promoted a
> way to directly connect enterprise data centers to Amazon’s global
> AWS network (“Outposts”) and also a way to connect telco
> points-of-presence to Amazon’s network (“Wavelength”). My
> understanding is that Microsoft has similar functionality for Azure
> (“Stack”, I believe) and Google either has or is working on
> something similar for their Google Cloud Platform. Similarly, large
> entities such as Facebook and Netflix have built their own global,
> private networks that interconnect to local data centers (where
> those data centers are also connected to the public Internet).

Some people here are probably aware of it, but I think it is an
opportunity to mention Geoff Huston's articles about the "death of
transit" <http://www.potaroo.net/ispcol/2017-03/gilding.html>
<https://2017.apricot.net/program/schedule/#/day/9/apnic-panel---forces-shaping-the-network>. I
don't agree with him but these articles seem relevant for this
specific part of the discussion.