Re: [arch-d] ETSI launches new group on Non-IP Networking addressing 5G new services

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 08 April 2020 21:33 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE703A17F2 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 14:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xXLnjThrceYh for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 14:33:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x133.google.com (mail-lf1-x133.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 745263A17EF for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 14:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x133.google.com with SMTP id h6so6365749lfc.0 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 14:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AZh4k2OXMBQNnLw7OHoykkWbwpKJipYvdU9D7D0zW6M=; b=ijCVnjjCi1pN2E2w/QbA3qcKyte9yHoa9l9+9PferlAMKAdJbvhf8TI6Fh3UEOfmbP 2PLo8XHkc7g53C4NuqL8G8LCgUj4lDCG6Iq/ZP3KInERS5OjI/3PtBNZsb63AR4aMYx7 PhLl4DxAK8NyOfuke1pIGRiYs0OK3+/gYSTC7wsV89RvhJzXsXPSAHvB8X2fEjzomSF6 1sNbUqjQaYhqJF/l0T7oW0KjHfk2ZLrsMoCrb1l7bqajsd9w+OVWo6S/Je+NujhaqWLn lMB9E5hTi6u8zqSLhHNxBbTK1+voj5nRLhKSjTqpm14NTyoHawfLBrMtdI6acqpfBN1A 4gXw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AZh4k2OXMBQNnLw7OHoykkWbwpKJipYvdU9D7D0zW6M=; b=U0irU2aYsJfzIObkvRG+D49l65ZesiV8e+tLbQavf8pk5BDnlknZ2ctUV7iQLXkGew jfTel+6B8JopzuUFK57mEnqEYpsyzzwHWPFZbkxHuLKWi8I7DYWv0H9FS6qN+qWWfcma k7r8/KWGU9NKRloXn37qaMqLFDQxPXcq24RacbkdKN9FJlIv4OgfxzfrcwIJth/w8cxu 8hbeAFbSN9KTl6eeJJTtQZutKtjMwj9fO2jSeljrszeCjW37u7JP0cfW3fOnjTSoR+b5 QTMwuhYb4kr7CvdOwPx1dwbctym/5Y6fdc6TCGHnvtWtl9/ZrDAx4r1I2mi/bnRuhCV2 X3Dg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZNvvi1uivYTsXf9UkM2CrBWgM9ozROmAfMklznr0u3r3P6q3LC uhpclzywdTCTWu5fbxaXMuNInAI0W84P4IEWWos=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJXk5nYJjSuSmX/2S8a3AZ/cN1I+wPJ99URVd7JwH0GN7/1p20pTfKuv+dfGrCVwdPvIQAe6GRidnWgGNNeafY=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:7411:: with SMTP id v17mr5816179lfe.27.1586381597384; Wed, 08 Apr 2020 14:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <60a10451-5fbd-fcec-5389-7a72870dcc84@gmail.com> <6A3A4410-A889-46C7-8FD5-7C5AA85486A1@tzi.org> <20200408055530.GC28965@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <551a2b4b-3cba-880d-e715-ecfbf138dc4c@gmail.com> <20200408212429.GN28965@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20200408212429.GN28965@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 16:32:51 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-f05q603xNN2MDQ8O4AqiHWkB_pKD4KmZj1fymhv-69Zw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000097243d05a2ce3ff3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/fdFB53wJqbtK9P9wugSl_HxTmvQ>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] ETSI launches new group on Non-IP Networking addressing 5G new services
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 21:33:22 -0000

I've gotta get back to work stuff (which this isn't, no matter how much fun
as it is), but

On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 4:24 PM Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:

(deleted down to)

Yes, it is quite weird to think that government policy based
> admission to a telecommunications standard body was ever
> considered to be a good idea. I have only come to experience it as a
> weapon in an economic war of aggression.


I couldn't possibly comment ...


> And IETF is not even
> marketing itself as being superior over such standard bodies
> using those type of examples.
>

Does anyone know if anything replaced https://open-stand.org/about-us/ (from
2012)?

Enjoy your days/nights, of course!

Best,

Spencer