Re: [arch-d] Side meeting on protocol development, the IETF and Internet consolidation at IETF 114

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Fri, 22 July 2022 15:31 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB137C14F748 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 08:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uTKWIfhSnNUI for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 08:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4354C14CF0E for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 08:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1oEucM-0003WF-Sv; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 11:31:06 -0400
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 11:31:01 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Mark McFadden <mark@mcfaddencentral.com>
cc: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <7B296F59914407E95BDC59D9@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <a1e6afde474c52cda2c2c5641cff6d14@mcfaddencentral.com>
References: <a1e6afde474c52cda2c2c5641cff6d14@mcfaddencentral.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/h8QFRsEW8RRav_zSiQHlzvkaehU>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Side meeting on protocol development, the IETF and Internet consolidation at IETF 114
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 15:31:12 -0000

Mark,

According to
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietf/meeting/wiki/114sidemeetings
there does not appear to be a plan for access to this session by
remote participants.  Is that correct?

   john


--On Thursday, July 21, 2022 09:33 -0500 Mark McFadden
<mark@mcfaddencentral.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> Public Side Meeting: Consolidation
> Protocol development, the IETF and Internet consolidation
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Thursday, 28 July 1600-1730 local time
> 
> Several recent Internet drafts have discussed aspects of
> consolidation and how protocol design and consolidation
> interact. While some of the drafts have had extensive
> revisions based on discussions on mailing lists, consolidation
> is not a part of any charter for a Working Group and seldom
> gets discussed in larger, plenary sessions.  The purpose of
> this session is to have a brief discussion of some of the
> important contributions and then a discussion of whether this
> should be a topic that gets more formal treatment within some
> part of the IETF, IAB or IRTF. One of the drafts describes
> consolidation as "the process of increasing control over
> internet infrastructure and services by a small set of
> organizations."
> 
> Draft agenda for the meeting:
> -----------------------------
> 1. Introduction, purpose and ground rules for the meeting
> 2. Characteristics of existing I-Ds that discuss consolidastion
> 3. Discussion of whether or not consolidation is an
> appropriate topic within the IETF
> 4. Assessment and agreement of next steps (e.g. meeting in
> London at 115)
> 5. AOB
> 
> The meeting will be chaired by Jim Reid.
> Questions or suggestions can be sent to mark <at>
> internetpolicyadvisors.com