Re: [arch-d] ETSI launches new group on Non-IP Networking addressing 5G new services

[Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]>]

On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:38:44AM -0700, S Moonesamy wrote:
> I don't see commenting on a draft as the community providing adult
> supervision to what the IAB may be working on.  As for pet topics, there are
> one or more topics which I may be familiar with.  Some people are more
> comfortable working on such topics.  Looking at things from the outside, it
> is easy for me to say that a model would work better.  The reality could be
> different.

Sure, its just my impression that the IETF WG and IRTG RG model
works a lot better from where i stand than the IAB model. 
I also didn't mean adult supervision in itself as a negativ
term, i am quite happy that overall it happens in a way it
does from IESG to WGs. I am just saying that i wish that
i do not see any benefits in how the IAB is run differently
from that model. 

> There isn't a unique model for protocol development (in the IETF).  I
> commented about architecture previously: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/2oi-BrLgaosxRL-Q6KXuHaO8S7o
> Sorry, that doesn't answer your question.

;-) Haha, well, that mail discuss is more an example of the problem
we have applying the IPv6 protocol architecture not only the
the Internet layer, but also to network layers (forgive the missng
well formalized names here). Different topic.

Cheers
    Toerless