Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)

Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Sat, 29 February 2020 01:57 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960B63A0917; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:57:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.318
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.318 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Eif3phJKcA1C; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:57:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7010C3A0936; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:57:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=TmKlkDyLBVckp3n6Q152Q4ZLUgtY1KQ0t4EjXGC5r/Y=; b=Mp+OpEJmxTyAlxFwW25koguJ8 etTnlFGhiwvllgVSeELIMu59tnhScuMbtLeESyb/Q1gVmkBHDNZSIkyBgA961sg32qsvp2O7/CpXK LtwPzqe64t73bmDX1JVIAm5eBJQRa2kKWSUovhJh0HEwuUjq/Nkh5DGa/CmUZd2I4YBx6LyKUl0gY RX+Ck2Y3aaivj+4/IpsC7yalaaMTXTU6nrd6kiIr8IUYhaxTU0t/V52TbXR/2bkx4vKd/3xCeX3LD VjYGRSya9gp54+l+2IWwSGil+OKrM7elqfc9eTsUlltsN+9Q+GegiwrZyH0GsEjWE3JcRNQLg7P8W 5InY6Nqeg==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:59499 helo=[192.168.1.10]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1j7rNU-000nNr-Oq; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 20:57:21 -0500
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E1B87947-52C4-4A87-AC9E-D5EC41A39512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwjeWXUmOEzvbUhrG1H8OMqG9EhcF3TzdZBA61LnySSPqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:57:15 -0800
Cc: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>, Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>, architecture-discuss@iab.org, Internet Area <int-area@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <D4BE857A-848E-47F1-82E9-CECFF03802DE@strayalpha.com>
References: <876c9105-3da4-e614-2db0-bea025b54663@si6networks.com> <7749f91f-03f1-cc14-bae8-5fe68c88879f@si6networks.com> <CALx6S36wN7VEi_rxLC1ETcTvkGaPhs20KhQrGWAGGTrCL5OT+g@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwg+4xMv=EKLfvmZMCgrQz31+38Fv0bYKeJ0fTB5vbXiaw@mail.gmail.com> <8d3e7b714666db00e0c05a2e06959da6@strayalpha.com> <CAMm+LwjYeSTro_TJujtRPDfVKtVMg7JbDL6A5V3Tj447c2E7nA@mail.gmail.com> <74763844-FA56-43DC-981E-E366E2C24758@strayalpha.com> <CAMm+LwjeWXUmOEzvbUhrG1H8OMqG9EhcF3TzdZBA61LnySSPqw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - iab.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/iE92JGIzOEXinSD54jX1J8keEq8>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] [Int-area] Is IPv6 End-to-End? R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 01:57:23 -0000


> On Feb 28, 2020, at 5:31 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> wrote:
> 
> I have a library that implements RFC6763. So my application code doesn't actually consider IP addresses.

Something does. I’m not aware of a network that uses DNS FQDNs as endpoint addresses or that can open a socket without ultimately using an IP address.

Just because you don’t see it doesn’t mean it isn’t how your system actually works.

Joe