Re: [arch-d] The Internet Architecture for Pandemics/Emergencies/Crises

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Sun, 10 May 2020 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BCC3A0A8F for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 May 2020 09:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id adgQEOCdQtwz for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 May 2020 09:28:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778AF3A0A8E for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 May 2020 09:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.180.116]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 04AGS063007007 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 10 May 2020 09:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1589128095; x=1589214495; i=@elandsys.com; bh=Kk/sF6Yxjr2HaslL3/combJqCKtrN/LljaUYhaNIRkk=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=bVTp/uC1eHEx15mhx6vbpjUEH+HRLfQ327QlJnN+iL6fXj4yw6R+2n91D1mhSS9iJ SjpMKOhgHipnLpxpcalqGyMnGkqN5gtTTwpSw7w7wX21/N3DENw4Og4ofbH52U45fc X9RHXC5ku5uTywBE2TRktus/gCf5M0QcoV/h3gb0=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200510090513.0ad089a8@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 09:26:34 -0700
To: Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKi_AEtcRgAgXjH=NTcpy0ZN92xpXhtS6Ht8C5FF+ir6OGyM7A@mail.g mail.com>
References: <CAKi_AEtez4BsCbNJ=avUC6bPhz8uXuttBQ_BRQu7izNXiEs6qA@mail.gmail.com> <20200508153318.GK62020@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <r972b4$439$1@gal.iecc.com> <CAKi_AEtcRgAgXjH=NTcpy0ZN92xpXhtS6Ht8C5FF+ir6OGyM7A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/kSVDSd7pIWvSVsjl3xjr_kK5D8A>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] The Internet Architecture for Pandemics/Emergencies/Crises
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 16:28:33 -0000

Dear Gunter,
At 06:55 AM 10-05-2020, Guntur Wiseno Putra wrote:
>Those the ISOC-sponsored organizations will perhaps be at field 
>together with this UN-sponsored initiative --especially with people 
>of "communication and management"-- to work on the Internet 
>(architecture--if there are emergencies)-related problems:
>Volunteers for Novel Coronavirus (Covid 19) Pandemic Response
>
><https://www.unv.org/Volunteers-for-Novel-Coronavirus-COVID-19-pandemic-response>https://www.unv.org/Volunteers-for-Novel-Coronavirus-COVID-19-pandemic-response

Thank you for sharing the link.  I was not aware of that initiative.

>This page said among others on how the pandemic affected essential 
>public services: a matter of which it is perhaps about the Internet 
>deployments..?

The impact, if there was one, would be localized as essential public 
services are provided by government.  There isn't any (unbiased) 
information to show that Internet deployments caused problems which 
affected essential public services.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy