IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arch-d] @ietf & @ iab: architecture-discuss

Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com> Sat, 29 February 2020 14:33 UTC

Return-Path: <gsenopu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 251533A0BBD for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 06:33:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dGNRr2mj46k1 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 06:33:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22c.google.com (mail-oi1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E17D3A0BB0 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 06:33:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id q81so5921713oig.0 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 06:33:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dzXF2QDDUMi1Ne+ZFiztCkYivx22MVsst+qpB/gfXXk=; b=Y2dLsi9/2PGkcLcypdBNyncxDzImAD8ya20DIcrj0govPLSg/EL0qOUpZu4nKZWgTe 1t7h4N0lyv1Yd0raqucIkSK98sMxwwVPOnmItL2CA++S2wRVJC/ueGhEThe9UFi9jJlY I+vyElJo6X0GZofTVs6LruVWQn5J+5X73NIVjAIFRS7gf7vsyYKMkO8y1gzmsgP2b2y+ UwvrnfXfRskjG5IX3MRgBepbntiVVU6Nwg/IiZIt7BrZwAcRs5SSq7eGbrlGKOOE0Bhu /tOXO7Zwp446tX60Gu1TSu2BJIJeFw1AOo/D1eiOmjG/yXNXGIvi5q74lpo3UxQebNH/ E0vw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dzXF2QDDUMi1Ne+ZFiztCkYivx22MVsst+qpB/gfXXk=; b=nCHeWeKph+bdKQ45gMNvEjh1FJm5n6XP5Bh2qu61pRgZ/erYlj9fKogY2DapkRYaBD KTKqXAyqNZgkJq+VSyDJU/7lIhOh+Hjlxe1Ro6xJWynx5eWHskPQjozxMjDmdmZJ1GtY r3ucQivoeTaMlfE/ZfvqLZhVPLBVBwIxOpfp4jhTz32cBzlHrkCiKlPr7lC+wo9iSQt2 YZJG7wG1bbjSJcKZpzhKAawQ6obUfm5ghS/f/e4+SdM6fACVqoLKud2vDWoFPAf/8SMJ 06ZijblfUdJU9/MkbNKiahm5kmnGOINvP1Fdv1IXCe6RIh3FVg3jvb4a7zhFAK9lgIwG ifaQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUtiCL7BKeT2e6XosD6C3Pq4jLWAGMYh7NHJcvLzzvRTk8hBtME JpBZAFtIVSInGb24Nc2pp5F0n92qf1JNtGzjpRijrQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxg2LDJ5tgi1+wwHfmjmfFKRy0yMr8Novu2/2AP6np0f2C6uk/ic9yCzn1vfB22rEzOcNKArgYFhvgL5vtWt5w=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:504e:: with SMTP id e75mr6188099oib.143.1582986788582; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 06:33:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1155:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sat, 29 Feb 2020 06:33:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0e3add61-b14b-00a5-337a-2d3ac5e693b1@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <CAKi_AEu8nkyiT6az7b0bmDVMEf9Md1BkMy2y95KkW6UFnoyNwg@mail.gmail.com> <e7cb8745-2c0b-7655-5429-9f71aa925990@cs.tcd.ie> <CAKi_AEvpedT3y1T2pMJ0F-2h8K7AXFW4zSJnmesyTrFii+qo_g@mail.gmail.com> <0e3add61-b14b-00a5-337a-2d3ac5e693b1@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 21:33:08 +0700
Message-ID: <CAKi_AEv3wZtV46y3XiNCJkeN0gd-SqT13SQnRhREOwV1WRdiAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: "architecture-discuss@ietf.org" <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>, "architecture-discuss@iab.org" <architecture-discuss@iab.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000037b89b059fb7d51c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/kp_0YwkgmFM-mhDrxAQMTqgcZ74>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] @ietf & @ iab: architecture-discuss
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 14:33:11 -0000

Dear Stephen &
architecture-discuss,

Thank you, Stephen.


Regard,
Guntur Wiseno Putra

Pada Sabtu, 29 Februari 2020, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
menulis:

>
>
> On 29/02/2020 14:12, Guntur Wiseno Putra wrote:
> > Dear Stephen &
> > architecture-discuss,
> >
> > So it is allright to corespond by and with either of the two
> addresses...?
> >
>
> I believe so. If something doesn't work, feel free to
> ping me off list.
>
> S.
>
> >
> >
> > Thank You & Regard,
> > Guntur Wiseno Putra
> >
> > Pada Sabtu, 29 Februari 2020, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie
> >
> > menulis:
> >
> >>
> >> Hiya,
> >>
> >> On 29/02/2020 12:18, Guntur Wiseno Putra wrote:
> >>> Dear architecture-discuss,
> >>>
> >>> It seems like a "puzzle": how could it be happened as this list has
> >>> its address architecture-discuss@ietf.org as I have been registered
> >>> to.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I don't see anything puzzling. I've not checked but I
> >> guess at some point in time only one of architecture-
> >> discuss@ietf.org and architecture-discuss@iab.org existed
> >> and people were sending mail to the wrong one so someone
> >> created an alias to solve the problem.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> S.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss
> >>>
> >>> but, there is also another address architecture-discuss@iab.org shown
> >>> by the discussion under the thread "[arch-d] Is IPv6 End-to-End?
> >>> R.I.P. Architecture? (Fwd: Errata #5933 for RFC8200)"  (it is so far
> >>> 28-29 February 2020)  as I could both receive in my mailbox and
> >>> participate in
> >>>
> >>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/p
> >>> 983OzMUPx1mX4BthpESUhCTMC0/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> While by this page the address is still
> >>> architecture-discuss@ietf.org
> >>>
> >>> https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss
> >>>
> >>> Regard, Guntur Wiseno Putra
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________ Architecture-discuss
> >>> mailing list Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss
> >>>
> >>
> >
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email