Re: [arch-d] centralization

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Fri, 12 March 2021 12:33 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E2C3A0912 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 04:33:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W_15AxSnc8rL for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 04:33:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEAB63A08F8 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 04:33:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153CBBE2F; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:33:32 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a0eOZdfTPv4n; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:33:30 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.244.2.242] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3A9FBE2C; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:33:29 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1615552409; bh=3A9QMqDgXH4bRcRUFMcynz6FyjyjPznCbyaKSiUKfG4=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=h7OxlGZJBWQNHlIDko/xDbzytNwh0Thk/4kbymlvkqVsGBp8lKEQSJbjuAxUPU/OG 0FoOPE32Ml7DyPm3cfSYY5bY8jyJZqgUorjHHq9u/PLpU/Ab2V8tPTTVjV0K510Aah bLyJGhn0ak6gKcKlbvf+czJIZr9MIx1sWT7LF9xY=
To: "Hutchison, David" <d.hutchison@lancaster.ac.uk>, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "architecture-discuss@ietf.org" <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
References: <0155CC72-571D-4540-8BD2-5A3B7FE4F7FB@lancaster.ac.uk>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <11840e55-3942-780f-00c6-038bd0a56d8c@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:33:29 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0155CC72-571D-4540-8BD2-5A3B7FE4F7FB@lancaster.ac.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iWfxm2SBKRavtHggHxoMIMifUh9PsSHP9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/kzergbokTUpQ8BQCqjfMNXb9VcU>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] centralization
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 12:33:38 -0000

Hiya,

On 12/03/2021 11:44, Hutchison, David wrote:
> 
> Of course, I agree resilience is an important topic to pursue -- and
> like Toerless I was disappointed to see the previous "lukewarm"
> response ...
Yeah, me too. It was funny that we had a good discussion
on this list around the end of 2019 but then once we
started a new list [1] it totally died. My conclusion
was that indicated that people were interested in chatting
but not in doing actual work on this topic.

S.

[1] https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/chirp