Re: [arch-d] ETSI launches new group on Non-IP Networking addressing 5G new services

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 10 April 2020 03:33 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1854F3A1A53 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 20:33:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hhaxmAHKv-fW for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 20:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x534.google.com (mail-pg1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3B1B3A1A52 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 20:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x534.google.com with SMTP id p8so461799pgi.5 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 20:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dpoY75CoVVj4Yzf9KkHCrufJ2syZPGun/wAXGUaF84I=; b=B/EGFB0ipH0BI9S7iYLVC6MeJ1Fm1Jv/FqugpHeoKY385iFp02XETLZqV+cjAxG4xu zNqSbGpRrhRwrhSn7yuXSdISEr2RgkW0jFFnoGcQ8ZawAOdJ9Z0k7BXvz7ZmMO3EqfkJ +EZdI9Kc57Tl0FTCtHNYUeGyBdwtH/BF5f7OIgqHrYJh+IlnDim2Od0lTH5XCUYyb6fl A8OCGA+BEKbeoM3WzYrn28ZT9BBJqyfkOQwBOeL4Me18/06AsDsgO1SW+QNL9PCEk5dH xh18gTrgbuAW+g+l+mtGhNFRIbeoo+9QkyIFBPKybCwpSgXa8znaDK4F4ZkuV0qQqIAt POcw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=dpoY75CoVVj4Yzf9KkHCrufJ2syZPGun/wAXGUaF84I=; b=t2NvVZx+6ucHzGGRNFVvuPEdYffQonhlktLqb+c/gKG+vS3BmEcrfV+d2K3MhwLAKD ilkQa1sMfBfIrg+c7qFgxRQXQcbo94qIHhm2ErrHm1JdmsfLHss/Dc+O/pOrJgcXY8f5 wMJZgr1+Ooen2A+ZoExn1zXZ2TqcIlh83LuuBYLHQ/tmu0WMCdkZ24d/d0Dg+DQOndpT SV7wTdaJpXyP71JzSkx7sCpQNgbGTIy8gCwa4wf0b6hlf7IFbUFlblZpaUo/91DdsUhr vMcYmKdVOWS/dxM1JzNlNUamBenm+DTEpg2HBoZzt1eAkPJRM1ixk7UlBQPaeZfmYCtC 8YYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubNtxCJsmSG/hCYJot+TusuXtue0Cr1ACErKjNcq6zxJjxKOH5+ P/QmpXwWFDMfBMf8G+CrvldskV0o
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLzt+hGsOA4gPd+P+ksRjCrIN5i85T5GSYZ64EUXTExeJ0HfnoxC5TtIZDHTFQRZ2K3ygWJ4A==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:1662:: with SMTP id 34mr2621893pgw.117.1586489578532; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 20:32:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] ([165.84.25.143]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id na18sm534896pjb.31.2020.04.09.20.32.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Apr 2020 20:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Cc: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
References: <20200409121941.GZ28965@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <C758BDF2-8CD6-4C22-90CA-6ED98DACD740@eggert.org> <20200409175431.GF28965@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <1e89795e-6bd9-2318-aa81-27f8327e1226@gmail.com> <229AAF4A-C43F-46E9-97C6-99CC124E9B48@gmail.com> <20200409212841.GK28965@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <0A15B52E-2A67-4D6A-AACF-8A92FB67ADEC@gmail.com> <20200409214205.GL28965@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <FCAB9CB5-32C6-4B03-A36B-29E83C4E8774@tony.li> <8D444744-A6C1-4313-982D-4C55F0F8A5AD@gmail.com> <20200410000937.GJ44502@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <97604e18-3c3d-cbcb-a4af-2ae94b815114@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 15:32:52 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200410000937.GJ44502@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/l7u8J5_BN35uFWiEeNrDkVO-SL8>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] ETSI launches new group on Non-IP Networking addressing 5G new services
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 03:33:01 -0000

On 10-Apr-20 12:09, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 03:07:14PM -0700, Dino Farinacci wrote:
>>> I was the one who asked the embarassing question about SRv6.
>>
>> And I was the won who said ???are we going to leave any data for the user???. Where I heard a loud Tony Li laugh from the audience.  ;-)
> 
> Btw. There are interesting hybrid optical/electrical research
> network architectures, where optical packets arriving are
> passed through an optical delay loop and the packet header
> spoofed into the electrical side to make packet
> processing decisions, which can then happen when the packet
> header starts to appear at the end of the optical delay loop.

That's roughly how computers worked in the early 1950s, with words
stored serially in mercury delay lines, where the bits travelled
at the speed of sound, so that micro-second latency vacuum tube logic
circuits could comfortably do their thing before the bits emerged
from the delay line.

Such computers were almost impossible to program and they died as
soon as faster memories were invented. The problem was that you had
to be ready exactly when the bits you wanted came around; this was
called optimum programming and the people who could do it were
the übergeeks of 1950.

As you said, "research architectures". Or limited domains, as
somebody else said.

> 
> Given how these optical networks will be many orders of
> magnitudes faster than the electrical processing
> capability, we may end up with networks that just scream
> to get larger packets to max out performance. 100 Kb minimum.
> And then we can waste all the header space we ever wanted.
> SIDs in URL encoding, x86 BIER replication function !!!!

Sure, but it won't help typical UDP streams much. We may not like
the historical traffic patterns, but we can't ignore them.

   Brian


> 
> Cheers
>     Toerless
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture-discuss mailing list
> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss
> .
>