Re: [arch-d] ETSI Liaison Work

Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com> Mon, 29 June 2020 03:43 UTC

Return-Path: <gsenopu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2623A07AC for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:43:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id axxosJEMcIiC for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x330.google.com (mail-ot1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::330]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F6F93A07A9 for <architecture-discuss@iab.org>; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x330.google.com with SMTP id w17so6332693otl.4 for <architecture-discuss@iab.org>; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=y61AsxQzq/1dXYBYFMNrXrep6u9QcsuQhrKpOvPHifs=; b=LlCVA7f84L5QHw/ZwtOYFb9QsBnow9VZ/6UmOSYFNy6dLD0Eir8/x2ZOBcOtEx2bcp mHbKBKs1KAXdTdA5NWmEJ5JxXOwtIozw2vLCLcaEnkZT+pM2Xgu8IYQ3ZsMFVB+zzl2o dW81BRvcCG7Li4x0kVY7pXEiC9wlR/ZrcBxlxAmiF4UDws+vGotNHG6uAdJn3teZorPa R9DCU5Q/N66fb70Yq+382WhNDuSHbMu+pRdEVqnDiCzECTEUx4n5sAKrlziIgZUF4YYl fuq6ir9AYAieh++7145zTXGZpSTz0C1JagZsoogJhyJEJZ5OmidC5q1OkIQPt+HOEOd9 45OQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=y61AsxQzq/1dXYBYFMNrXrep6u9QcsuQhrKpOvPHifs=; b=d+ogu3eJL5M5A2CDOn7xqbMkeyV48R1mXLZoUc31IAmcnSOjvFYcNsMbzrNUBnbGmf m/XnQuEwzKZ4I+skKOXMnC944CBf6lu0qex+eu4091ym2Ev08XjYil/UDLCLztDSSk5y +XrZXZR0F72t1KQ9npu/RqhQmDd8zMZRSK7OMDRycqHUke3sfntcjr05qSzQbtkX4xB6 DCvY3hagjlIUzQbMMyx1AVlhEQfe8fw/08HR+i1r/7YkxK9nxRXTOE4HbzjFxmQimosG IAGkZH6vspzE3Z5b5rhFr8LLZRacwhrhXwnsi6BJvcQQccBRjrl6cWpmr3eb8RXRf0x/ fOWQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532RnP+k+1Z+2d7EFRr8FR28XXs1HhC4s+a3pMfPoMy4hTFeKM/m 2YL1VYlZn8+Glq37d/bFX8SVaNaXgdHO83jMjto=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwC0xkzBCgJCa68Ong9VqPVDzHO7D0ei+1MrnwDZTHg+zLap9iEZtzVNvX02RFeSDyAAH1/LDM67JOOS64tVZU=
X-Received: by 2002:a4a:a64b:: with SMTP id j11mr8760370oom.24.1593402195422; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a9d:3449:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 20:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6Swcn-y9UevzVB_TgTaPO4PU5Y_hXUBy6i=P9++3c18Vvw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAChr6SwT2MV-wg5ZA25_Z-iPReX6YZKzPUifBk+-G7js8iFgtw@mail.gmail.com> <9407069F-19E1-4AC1-BE4D-B7D6F62CC34F@vpnc.org> <CAChr6Swcn-y9UevzVB_TgTaPO4PU5Y_hXUBy6i=P9++3c18Vvw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:43:15 +0700
Message-ID: <CAKi_AEvu4ESKogckHz12n_UQweMHiFuQVKKApi4+_Yy71wTGYA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, "architecture-discuss@iab.org" <architecture-discuss@iab.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d7b29105a930db70"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/lAdTUoja2dUOVRThjutes4qQ5sg>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] ETSI Liaison Work
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 03:43:18 -0000

Dear Rob &
architecture-discuss,


Adding a collection of references on "ETSI" having not been mentioned so
far in this thread:

(By the help of the search engine available at "liaison statements" for
"ETSI":)
Total Statements: 94


https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/posted/?text=ETSI&source=&destination=&start_date=&end_date=


Regard,
Guntur Wiseno Putra

Pada Senin, 29 Juni 2020, Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> menulis:

> On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 8:14 AM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Although there are always layer 8 and 9 reasons for having, or not
>> having, liaison agreements, ...
>>
>
> Yes. This is the substance of my question.
>
> thanks,
> Rob
>
> PS - I used the word "reviewed", but I should have written "read and
> commented", since no one asked me to do anything. :)
>