[arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy

Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com> Wed, 15 January 2020 00:49 UTC

Return-Path: <gsenopu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C80120046 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:49:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T9PMe0FcfIGR for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:49:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32e.google.com (mail-ot1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5408B12002F for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:49:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id m2so9733554otq.3 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:49:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=cvTSX72KBbFQ1TmwtzTXDKzpP2dBN6GINgMs9j3Ub1c=; b=f3oG4LHUF4l/3R6AZJdUEvi0xaNjGmDlOQctVjieR0hBt9q3GtLmdxAzS2NlhJxygo Us3uTAdBlSl3Zscy4+BEBuOwj+pcbPnqqfNW3ZfepjGd+MZGNSYJcTajYESIU0JRr/ST +NJbsdKfzeFWsF12kaAZuEDz1HxMeCqzLPavgc+e11JZ8l7yStFj1j7wSG1oWt81/GJ5 pgujxwBVz9SMgy+06sQB6jcHn3WetNgBfT2n4f8bL/h7T+qNQIJ69947xOvTSzuJ0/np 0mvBcMjBXevSi8Yv2IAdWbclamkiS+540CQIuGCYkItTN8QkbTI6uvtteUHf+92KQYyA kiDA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cvTSX72KBbFQ1TmwtzTXDKzpP2dBN6GINgMs9j3Ub1c=; b=T2uIlaoNdQJtq+Ck+yB14JndU/zSfiV2PAni9P6OPgsxw8gDVGLWugivJMkzrOwE1G KhSHv+CKganmUh0IAveP1/PkuqyWX/YKojq4MCWJN7onW60cV+z8G/EP4iyhJPXiDck4 ZH4IYsC4ge8VbQb42R7L3c/JnkV3RjtFNZ49+0W3aEWyPwrUhYgIA6jYCfHejWko5FIn NqceNY3tre7keUrvutii954knIVg2H/QTs6UISceytv0pboW5Jf7YLTnWVvu2cIqNONE rl3qahBVixF0+V81TSCt72BREqvApchAsXSs2UpSusfMa7z01mqnulWppa0e4qRV8muF Cu6Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUSXUAsKCSq5Iap2lRXI0cFc9icKrGkT9HLfOx/TJfMbVv81OGr JNYlH8tWEimr5MF3rYsPdZnfxjsmZ52cA2YZW5w=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxBBqt1YSm12ou4/24cXylSCpVggp/I776JWVXR7dW4CCaFoLJvaK40ec0Ft8s+pb7x2JJ5hxkSG2r3nL5KjWE=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:65da:: with SMTP id z26mr868283oth.197.1579049367638; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:49:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1155:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:49:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20200114030935.0befd4d0@elandnews.com>
References: <4e888f0a-a1e8-df72-cbbc-9a2e2f0d0d05@iab.org> <CAL02cgTOAEH43zs-CjCSs64gTre65eXrSfNOBXCWDFYyfMkLvg@mail.gmail.com> <CAOW+2duibA8AJ8jkVeeJc9Eb917neT1jqc_EEc8EmaQ1idpbXg@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200114030935.0befd4d0@elandnews.com>
From: Guntur Wiseno Putra <gsenopu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 07:49:26 +0700
Message-ID: <CAKi_AEtNh7X+5ypAnmCihC_9wEnHkjM0QtbJrwzKgT5cY0TMuw@mail.gmail.com>
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Cc: Bernard Aboba <bernard.aboba@gmail.com>, "architecture-discuss@ietf.org" <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a417f0059c23143f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/lP1_e4ZqEYkNTFlb6N6fommrGy0>
Subject: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:49:30 -0000

Dear architecture-discuss,

Analogies and contextualizations/adaptations: These works may inspire
others what ara better than me --as I tried in the previous message to"read
architecturally on esthetics and ethics in cyberspace, in Internet"

- "Esthetique et ethique de l'environement" which was part of readings on
"sustainable development": "Developmment durable, durability d'un concept".
Jon Postel himself used the term "Internet environment" on RFC 791-Internet
Protocol.


Nathalie Blanc
<https://www.espacestemps.net/en/auteurs/nathalie-blanc-english/>,
« Éthique et esthétique de l’environnement. », *EspacesTemps.net
<http://ps.net>* [En ligne], Works, 2008 | Mis en ligne le 31 January 2008,
consulté le 31.01.2008. URL : https://www.espacestemps.net/
en/articles/Ethique-et-esthetique-de-environnement/ ;

- Section "La forme de la raison est un e(sthe)tique de l'espace" in "Le
concept de toust est une forme; le pensee spatiale de Peter Sloterdijk":
"Cyberspace" is a way to say about "Internet".

Hervé Regnauld <https://www.espacestemps.net/auteurs/herve-regnauld/>, « Le
concept de tout est une forme : la pensée spatiale de Peter Sloterdijk. »,
*EspacesTemps.net* [En ligne], Travaux, 2011 | Mis en ligne le 2 mai 2011,
consulté le 02.05.2011. URL :
https://www.espacestemps.net/articles/le-concept-de-tout-est-une-forme-la-pensee-spatiale-de-peter-sloterdijk/
;

Regard,
Guntur Wiseno Putra

Pada Selasa, 14 Januari 2020, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> menulis:

> Hi Bernard,
> At 02:59 PM 09-01-2020, Bernard Aboba wrote:
>
>> Agree with Richard here.  Much of the IAB work is technical in nature.
>> The IAB should therefore not need a conflict-of-interest policy as heavy
>> weight as that required to assume a senior role within government, a
>> legislature or a governmental advisory committee.
>>
>
> I took at a look at the requirements for the IAB.  From what I understand,
> an IAB member is expected to act at the "Board" level.  There are also
> other desirable qualities such as experience in Internet governance.  I
> have some experience of the former.  Some situations related to conflict of
> interest issues can be resolved without too much difficulty as it is matter
> of understanding how such matters are generally managed. issues.  There are
> pros and cons to having that in written form.  For example, if a committee
> consists of people from very different backgrounds, the committee might
> view it as easier to have some (written) guidance.  One of the
> disadvantages is that some people might be of the view that they only have
> to follow what is written.  There are other issues I can think of. I doubt
> anyone on this mailing list would be interested in them.
>
> There have been a few comments about the work being technical in nature.
> The IAB minutes show, for example, an item which is described as a "hot
> topic".  As it does not look directly related to engineering, I don't see
> how the topic could be described as being technical in nature.
>
> Is the IAB an advisory committee?  That does not match some announcements,
> e.g. the request for feedback on the selection of an individual to a board.
>
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture-discuss mailing list
> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss
>