Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Thu, 16 January 2020 09:58 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13FB9120024; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 01:58:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.871
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.871 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zbsVN6epC1Ev; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 01:58:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5871A120019; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 01:58:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7309E54804C; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 10:58:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 6AD04440059; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 10:58:20 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 10:58:20 +0100
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, IETF Rinse Repeat <ietf@ietf.org>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200116095820.GA20495@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <4e888f0a-a1e8-df72-cbbc-9a2e2f0d0d05@iab.org> <20200115221637.GA32014@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAOj+MMFaXnWs1Au6HWZ_CMFt4oyYUExPt2C_r9VnStRaUgf_ng@mail.gmail.com> <b6525973-32dd-1ac2-d354-d39aa916082b@gmail.com> <m21rs0qay4.wl-randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m21rs0qay4.wl-randy@psg.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/mCuCC2PKW1EuwLIEj0TBqOgMlpk>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 09:58:27 -0000

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 08:31:15PM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
> i know this is terribly old fashioned and silly of me.  but some see
> roles as public service for the good of the internet.  and some of us
> are spoiled brats whose employers support them willy nilly.

My take: The only way to prove that there is no conflict of interest
is when i can prove that i will harm my own interests through what i do.
Maybe a reference to Exodus 22:28.

That was fun. Now, can we move beyond sillyness ? 

I hope that most participants in IETF honestly think that what they work
towards is not morally evil, but many of us hopefully are also aware
that our work is in support of one of potentially multiple competing
commercial options whose outcomes do impact revenue and market
experience of different group of market participants.

Politicians are regularily accused of COI when they change from/to
a job in the industry that relates to their political work, so they
do not even do both things in parallel like most of us do.

Let me repeat my original question: I want user stories:

What would be a good reference example for the most minor COI                                         
that one should be concerned about in an IAB candidate/member ?

Toerless