Re: [arch-d] Other SDOs (Re: ETSI launches new group on Non-IP Networking addressing 5G new services)

[Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]>]

On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 02:26:50PM +0200, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On 2020-04-08, at 21:41, Toerless Eckert <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > 
> > When would have
> > IETF leadership ever have tried to explain/help IETF attendants to
> > do better work in another SDO ?
> 
> I???m not sure WG chairs qualify as ???leadership??? in your view (they do, in my view), but that has been a constant theme for us in IoT-land.

Ok. great. I did mention i can imagine this to happen better in APP/ART,
if it also happens in IoT land, all the better. I was just
coming from not seeing it for ITU-T.

Cheers
    Toerless

> > Which meeting did i miss about this ?
> 
> Well, we didn???t quite start by saying ???this is the way we, the IETF, will work with other SDOs, now eat it???.  We started by working with other SDOs and tried to find out what they actually need.
> Interestingly, one of the homes of that work is the T2TRG, as it turns out that IETF and other-SDO work isn???t already perfectly aligned, so you need a wider view (and a longer outlook) to really be useful.
> 
> I???m sure we are not yet nearly doing enough of this, but you can???t say we (as an organization) ignore working with other SDOs.
> 
> > Maybe with the small exception of RTCweb and W3C (or maybe even more
> > in APP, i am not that much involved there).
> 
> It may help that some of the IoT work is in ART (which encompasses what previously was APP).
> 
> Grüße, Carsten