Re: [arch-d] Updates on IAB mailing lists

S Moonesamy <> Mon, 20 April 2020 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944333A0FBB for <>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:57:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.203
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)"
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mBZiSpPpv-IX for <>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF133A0FB8 for <>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 03KKvXcd029391 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:57:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail; t=1587416265; x=1587502665;; bh=BlVWYYTL9aKHnySuxT86iD3W7nkBYl1ESKhjObJs2WQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=p6aXcidiUEVoijjhxP+JGMhx6FjWZvWhp4Uv0Oy+/2zPAwZTcaAvnsjM8D0QzSCQt kpdVmtSXn7a7E0uPnzkDLfLDNhNAE+bM1vYoY+H5Gusm/B4UOMwesSi7zPhGhIhLTx U9JszsTaw26HwA+kWECrm8bFddfVIVG8M8fxjuAw=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:54:29 -0700
To: Tommy Pauly <>,
From: S Moonesamy <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Updates on IAB mailing lists
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 20:58:00 -0000

Dear Mr Pauly,
At 09:08 AM 20-04-2020, Tommy Pauly wrote:
>We'd like to share a few updates about IAB mailing lists, and 
>solicit the community's feedback on some new text.
>First, Tommy Pauly will be joining Stephen Farrell on the (existing, 
>but rarely employed) sergeants-at-arms team to help moderate the list.
>Second, we'd like to clarify the sergeants-at-arms roles for the 
>lists. The current description on 
> does mention that the lists 
>use a sergeant-at-arms model for moderation, but does not describe 
>what this role entails. It also does not specify if this role 
>applies to all of the lists on the page, such as program lists.
>We're proposing adding the following text to 
>, largely based on the IETF 
>list SAA. We'd love to hear feedback on this approach!

I would like to thank the Internet Architecture Board for requesting 
feedback about the mailing list.  Given 
the domain name in that email address, isn't it a mailing list which 
falls under the Internet Engineering Task Force?

There was an announcement about the moderators some time ago.  I 
don't recall seeing them  described as "sergeant-at-arms".  I looked 
up the term and I found this: "in feudal England a sergeant at arms 
was an armed officer of a lord and was often one of a special body 
required to be in immediate attendance on the king's person, to 
arrest traitors and other offenders".  Given some recent 
interventions on the ietf@ mailing list, I would not suggest the 
sergeant at arms as a model to follow.

S. Moonesamy