Re: [arch-d] Updates on IAB mailing lists

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Mon, 20 April 2020 21:27 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1A33A1067 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:27:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a4U42F5vDqxV for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEDE3A1063 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:27:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.116.37.130]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 03KLR1Z3024919 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:27:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1587418033; x=1587504433; i=@elandsys.com; bh=O8Phn99+eDqBjEGIWppx4JrpAhqu671vHfigwa2V+Aw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=2TXkkJFNg10b1/mwIgJeyKsO1MWs6epaP15qxPA8+weTal3t5CfWSyKKTdVAndKnX 4jvHn7kZgRH8+cM8vFUX8nwPhLSHqP1msZ9ijDWSbUhBwoyUFGO3m3iyUI1YR524HY BB8HaSq2S6+0wWTa1ZdrSBrawVtCJalX9fgs1xM4=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200420141040.0e5895f0@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:26:49 -0700
To: Tommy Pauly <tpauly@apple.com>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <91AA234A-7375-4A04-872B-5B1AB3FA79FF@apple.com>
References: <303F494F-F06C-4E6A-99E5-089798EB56DB@apple.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200420124357.12e4b868@elandnews.com> <91AA234A-7375-4A04-872B-5B1AB3FA79FF@apple.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/n4O8eMlVpzu6hTr68sU2_5mo0yA>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Updates on IAB mailing lists
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 21:27:21 -0000

Dear Mr Pauly,
At 02:04 PM 20-04-2020, Tommy Pauly wrote:
>This mailing list is, in fact, an IAB-sponsored activity. The email 
>address is confusing for historical reasons. 
>architecture-discuss@iab.org is an alias for the same list.

Ok.

>The SAA role for the mailing list already existed, and the goal of 
>this text is to clarify what the role is on the public website. It 
>is primarily a way to moderate spam and ensure that a mailing list 
>is a respectful and productive space. If there are particular 
>suggestions for the content and scope of the role in terms of the 
>textual description, I'd be happy to hear them.

Most of the mailing list I am subscribed to have a moderator.  The 
practice is for the person to curtail spam and see that mailing list 
discussions do not go out of hand.  If I had a suggestion to make, it 
would be to figure out a description which the IAB members consider 
as appropriate for this mailing list.

It may happen that you take a decision which I disagree with.  It 
does not mean that you are wrong or that you are doing a bad 
job.  That is the nature of things.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy