IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc6635bis-03> (RFC Editor Model (Version 2))

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Wed, 11 September 2019 02:04 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00739120088 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jTMy32KLSUFs for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x544.google.com (mail-pg1-x544.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::544]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 750BF1207FE for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x544.google.com with SMTP id n4so10701388pgv.2 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=l00ETzA9TeQycUvFHX1UL7u6VIy6ZJkxCLHJhygPr8o=; b=E+V8poLMCY5q7kI8KqU9ZZHP25Z3MTdKgSRINJvhT0L0CBR8tUn8IxpIylke6yCXN0 piMZiNsriOhRuzrrA0vY/Vts1NKhUe8A5OMoAqDjRF6Jrp8NUHa2dTIF0RsL0PWatwfj TOP7CUdqND36wK+TqJnZ+cHa0mR7Yz+EWWExTTZeMqyD7YhI9F363SUF5PJdsd5T0gOb jASE5i4sbbogSzqsKr056uWqImcZ7u3TBHIHp+jcla7V29hvEVvCKF0mCVlwLyvCk96j X2QKD8mHt2oRBy/5UWvfftqt1keTAfF10GasHzbu4lh26rAOF7usF3pQru3tqqWJOwbC YPlA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=l00ETzA9TeQycUvFHX1UL7u6VIy6ZJkxCLHJhygPr8o=; b=Pzua/dqKrtCv7pF+GvAJljrD7PKcMKMSy2pHq/lnfmfi99R0EiU6AXAggVwdnT9ZIp OFryxICibLAokWTTfCx5Mu3+XCaU8ZHS1zlrAn1SuxBB9cgJovvZzI4Cpy5z4wILHWKi gaWAauPR/qWaBQDwW6hKTphBGORDJruLGpoC2XtJIqSUaWO2ZRGaaIf88y5xPHmBLnQK XHOMG8eIbKcZZlhLXwQvzMoXFoQPY9ox1hhXGgoIOsaglWXUVZRxkcOkSD3nroRc/BCJ aHT3i9pDruqsc/4cctdftaC3LehsYVVi3SMUlRxOgwjbQ00JfwB9qBtv4E/NyRShqF27 NyIw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUHAgUKzS8BSUvc9ISA2IjhdttbRQ+Lh4g5gD2DXXEzJR5AdMbc wfjapXP5N/DV18N/WGqMos6LYUYy
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxqliX+JsbZo+o5vMSOEuYydpAlWofczciKLkGMutr9Y1j96hYpRsNddGJ4OXPOEhINGfFxQw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:9749:: with SMTP id i9mr2843476pjw.42.1568167490839; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.30] (82.206.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.206.82]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l124sm18412928pgl.54.2019.09.10.19.04.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Sep 2019 19:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
To: architecture-discuss@ietf.org, iab@iab.org
References: <156763077985.22753.8206505094680303304.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: RFC Interest <rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20e11a4f-26d6-24e3-f82e-b3a2bc8d1eec@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:04:46 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <156763077985.22753.8206505094680303304.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/pRCWT_bYP7y3TauytctxNT6SDyE>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Call for Comment: <draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc6635bis-03> (RFC Editor Model (Version 2))
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 02:04:54 -0000

Hi,

I believe this draft does represent the consensus of the IASA2 WG and cleans up some loose ends from the IAOC to IETF LLC transition. However, I believe that it should not be published as an RFC. The discussions that will soon start about the future of the RFC Editor model make that rather pointless.

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

On 05-Sep-19 08:59, IAB Executive Administrative Manager wrote:
> This is an announcement of an IETF-wide Call for Comment on 
> draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc6635bis-03.
> 
> The document is being considered for publication as an Informational RFC 
> within the IAB stream, and is available for inspection at:
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-iasa2-rfc6635bis/>
> 
> The Call for Comment will last until 2019-10-02. Please send comments to
> architecture-discuss@ietf.org and iab@iab.org.
> 
> Abstract
> 
>    The RFC Editor model described in this document divides the
>    responsibilities for the RFC Series into three functions: the RFC
>    Series Editor, the RFC Production Center, and the RFC Publisher.
>    Internet Architecture Board (IAB) oversight via the RFC Series
>    Oversight Committee (RSOC) is described, as is the relationship
>    between the IETF Administration Limited Liability Company and the
>    RSOC.  This document reflects the experience gained with "RFC Editor
>    Model (Version 1)", documented in RFC 5620; and obsoletes RFC 6635 to
>    replace all references to the IASA and related structures with those
>    defined by the IASA 2.0 Model.
> 
>    [RFC Editor: Please remove the following paragraph prior to
>    publication.]
> 
>    The IASA2 WG requests that the IAB publish this replacement for RFC
>    6635.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> IETF-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email