Re: [arch-d] possible new IAB programme on Internet resilience

"Marc Blanchet" <> Fri, 20 December 2019 14:06 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21EB21200B9 for <>; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 06:06:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.888
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.888 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8yF7r8NVVAyt for <>; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 06:06:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::836]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A655120128 for <>; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 06:06:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id d18so5584684qtj.10 for <>; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 06:06:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=y+aE4yAwUZockxD/68A0J4qiN8RdZ2shUeDCQ8MhRyc=; b=DHgXJBhGXLMkiFT6GBs/Y1x8zwH1D2GG8Q96L9ZIVSqi2BxrLe1jzsLLZ0awdn80nz 9NAv2oaWemg9hH7xfPONZ5exJSKxKuXlgFYqffES51qVsmiUYdcKHfLbp1OW2cJe1CWv mEFFSrhyiJOXB16OWSkGDs9WpG9QkfntECIA5ADF5JDTflBB3W+9YuPAr4+U9Ok92n3t CCPNMkd344hKeV77i9Omxx2TuxWxt5pokvgWSJz3DdYAIpI+Ytanyi7t8RI3rSeW13rY njxY7CBkbduKXAC0XQxiu60MJHxV/FyLsCTqgBtwaq2/gpmGzrYnlS3V3fHjlUpJ8mlf HjnQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=y+aE4yAwUZockxD/68A0J4qiN8RdZ2shUeDCQ8MhRyc=; b=NYvPpKZ4hooFS5EZ//Q5O2yCr/YEQrGZSI9ignfIFwL2TKxkg72TFjGUtI2+ac4CTC EBIaneJAjJBPSZ7Wgz3KeJz4mP14W31anw+5xxEr8BnbBDQd1NXiXauLfSLC3XflYJeY L0Bwah54didCs+6R0ieHhM/+0Y6JhiAyFHKfp7gwdGmuL2pSci+8XBiHLYh5LMgYdy3Q 5H4/GAYtfpHV6Fzf1ls0EbEKOlaaUVvuG/30smpV3oE7Q8994VkZ3SrTfp1nodktT/GX 2cHg2QrLLFGKi3QRsCXTz4dyoBMomErTTpM66/AicAOBQfqy4HHE8YW92yXLh45aNWF7 q3dg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVC6nOgg0eBIlBVawTrv9xRGCCm9I4WaOD5DxZ/gXGMs4gfpFA3 oPB0q8HezPwvckO3BhUkMcQyKGeYaqlh7w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwxt+LLg3t4aT08TpGPaNaazls6+fws2i0wT8tx2hLSrr2ArYdOHbW0zIve4f3F3+uJAhh8rQ==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5156:: with SMTP id h22mr11626855qtn.290.1576850798172; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 06:06:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [] ( []) by with ESMTPSA id g21sm2792789qkl.116.2019. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 20 Dec 2019 06:06:37 -0800 (PST)
From: "Marc Blanchet" <>
To: "Stephen Farrell" <>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 09:06:34 -0500
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13.1r5671)
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] possible new IAB programme on Internet resilience
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 14:06:42 -0000

On 20 Dec 2019, at 8:32, Stephen Farrell wrote:

> Hiya,
> The IAB are considering starting up a programme on Internet
> resilience as described at [1]. We'd love to get feedback
> on that idea, the text at [1] and to find out if people
> would like to participate and what topics you might suggest
> be considered (or even better, what you'd actually do work
> on yourself:-).

Hello, good idea. been discussed for years by many. good to see the IAB 
take the lead.
good proto charter. I would complement that, while diversity is key, it 
is not the only facet that needs to be looked at for resilience. I could 
think of others, such as decreasing DDOS capabilities by: « don’t 
advertise/forward what’s wrong »: for example: BGP lack of basic 
filtering, BCP38, …  Maybe this is out of the scope you had in mind.

happy to contribute. can’t tell right now which topic, could be many.


> There's no specific deadline for this, but the IAB will
> consider this further in the new year, so if you could
> take a few minutes to share your thoughts on this before
> or over the holidays that'd be great.
> Thanks,
> S.
> [1]
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture-discuss mailing list