Re: [arch-d] New Version Notification for draft-iab-for-the-users-01.txt

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Sat, 14 December 2019 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3614412004A for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 07:25:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZIl0Wxfw9E4X for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 07:25:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B60712003E for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Dec 2019 07:25:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.115.131.9]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id xBEFP0jp012864 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 14 Dec 2019 07:25:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1576337113; x=1576423513; i=@elandsys.com; bh=y4BSM2q1WrMcZn0IMV1aJ5WjvcmnESK0q+dCetz84rQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=0TrpnztAx3aoiPkAGIgxWluhrQSKd0QuKezCyCemrguIdH3xmYb+1NLi9Ymx3iMAq YeO6tdPOLNyVJTmFZgkDI0NKr2nRLi+fPqikAHdl6MTEl5m4aNqgHVq0Iy4m6T0uFZ S7fPtdOhu+2aD1vs5c13Q8vt0njscebs/2J4XbGQ=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20191214065306.11c9aa98@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 07:22:27 -0800
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <326C92A0-5F29-411D-99DE-7C785CF73EE7@cisco.com>
References: <157403781873.6404.6154827441040413193.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <01246A3C-31EC-4B7B-841D-F799EEFADCB8@mnot.net> <227662299.12784.1575991106819@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <C74D5288-709B-46E3-B9F9-4FDE0234C451@fugue.com> <429195684.13066.1575996064551@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <0C729385-1361-460C-9C16-E1BE1680A3E6@fugue.com> <1100636076.15285.1576072588087@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <4A034991-E5C8-4797-B6BF-9484BB2FA614@fugue.com> <31473650-0872-4EFE-A99C-E3DD4CDBC700@cisco.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1912130913480.8529@bofh.nohats.ca> <326C92A0-5F29-411D-99DE-7C785CF73EE7@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/qQSzmY3VonIgp3MKwz3Bdnv8tIc>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] New Version Notification for draft-iab-for-the-users-01.txt
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 15:25:17 -0000

Hi Mark,

There is the following in Section 3: "The IETF has focused on user 
needs since [RFC0001] ..."  That is like stating that the IETF has 
focused on user needs since 1969.  How could that be possible if the 
first IETF meeting was held in 1986?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy