Re: [arch-d] [Last-Call] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-for-the-users-02> (The Internet is for End Users)

On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 3:20 PM Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> wrote:

> On 2/5/2020 5:48 PM, IAB Executive Administrative Manager wrote:
> > This is an announcement of an IETF-wide Call for Comment on
> > draft-iab-for-the-users-02.
> >
> > The document is being considered for publication as an Informational RFC
> > within the IAB stream, and is available for inspection at:
> > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iab-for-the-users/>
> >
> > The Call for Comment will last until 2020-03-04. Please send comments to
> > architecture-discuss@ietf.org and iab@iab.org.
> >
> > Abstract:
> >
> >     This document explains why the IAB believes the IETF should consider
> >     end users as its highest priority concern, and how that can be done.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IETF-Announce mailing list
> > IETF-Announce@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>
> Does this document represent an IAB consensus/aspiration or is this Mark
> writing as an IAB member?
>
> If the former, Mark should be listed as Editor, and the document should
> include text indicating how the IAB arrived at consensus (e.g. "This
> document represents the consensus of the IAB arrived at through
> (internal discussions | discussions with the community | workshop
> results | etc) " ).   If the latter, the document should indicate "This
> document represents the author's personal opinion".
>

Are there competing opinions on the IAB?

"The Internet is not for End Users" ?
"The Internet is for Network Operators" ?

thanks,
Rob