Re: [arch-d] [Last-Call] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-for-the-users-02> (The Internet is for End Users)

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Thu, 06 February 2020 00:04 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B43E1200A4; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 16:04:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oxSkmq-rzQO2; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 16:04:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x144.google.com (mail-il1-x144.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19C7312008D; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 16:04:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x144.google.com with SMTP id p8so3475629iln.12; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 16:04:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0CLglRLUkNLBjYdSdV1GKPrUEV41d1pGneC59t9ZHM0=; b=sR5BnYvceUbQw0qiZUzL0zXaHcYXr23/gix3phP9ya0stAncPV+tjFSF6s5IKXPXI2 +5CdKwGQIhDsxNokaJaYzkzTlpls4WvjfYyI9WCOx+9/d4KfWlR8WjVusbidyRw0cV5K I5nvwPPkdI0TxGSYFDIdRtUVW7uM9iCg3KkeNRxxf8FwFieHo7n+OxubBgDRs8eENrxE so/zlvCWXGL5maDAQZoLecxWTBPbfH4gY3NhEWYowL0k40ypUUqDusyiAPEXHNZX+igJ OnZhpitmKf3qcAU3OGdWBQ4eTGOh5Hs9xjZpa/FGQMasrR1mNhvSvWuAEAEQWwM2D2et k2Uw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0CLglRLUkNLBjYdSdV1GKPrUEV41d1pGneC59t9ZHM0=; b=sVo+jjpVbDBTOlmDI4QpXDv7Uz57+Ynieo6LjF/etJNT3tWLu/wAjxALARbNhFtW5A aPLcU+Ume0S0UVyeQTYbKJp6Z4BrlgHMgm0ec3q2lSTl2J3lbvLbNWPLczQX8oWmxxkZ dyJVStMhocqE61u9flWvW4DQxnR8LGQcI7TBsvUelmDdl2LpxqHevxVZucGSPuaEmqH6 YMJ8XbR1DVAJSHlBkbj3RQPOG6j6vc26DpWAGevfdAe+8ZwvI8X0m2C4KKnsmEL9rHWi AIl43sD1z8fvzA0s7yNsZzsTv15pe7g0efHRm4MKFZcLi2rFjPUzCgCajhVIxgGmV1DY rP0Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX6+wAJPyLhv1+DF1kv8/rQyjvg8NpYGtB5ZVZol5egDe3F/A8z gw+HAZ4PFhUOC2mlZIYVjHGFdvWwT1w7GQo9dGM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyF4oyWbbNe8IKMtnrwGvllLkmOoUomC8TJGWswSU70zgCHVvaJdBRu3bH5Z3aurx3U7dTYdqySxmh9IeZJp/Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:990b:: with SMTP id p11mr825689ili.254.1580947458117; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 16:04:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158094293707.31222.730373457433066701.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <be64994d-89eb-690b-ae97-b21626415504@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <be64994d-89eb-690b-ae97-b21626415504@comcast.net>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 16:04:03 -0800
Message-ID: <CAChr6SwRNFVjF7X+JiuAxsrGJAyiW2AofwQoBXa+xFqLvFtFtQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
Cc: architecture-discuss@ietf.org, iab@iab.org, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a653e1059ddd0378"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/qlGAbjYHPjVeq5sAjEfscv2-1dU>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] [Last-Call] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-for-the-users-02> (The Internet is for End Users)
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:04:21 -0000

On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 3:20 PM Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> wrote:

> On 2/5/2020 5:48 PM, IAB Executive Administrative Manager wrote:
> > This is an announcement of an IETF-wide Call for Comment on
> > draft-iab-for-the-users-02.
> >
> > The document is being considered for publication as an Informational RFC
> > within the IAB stream, and is available for inspection at:
> > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iab-for-the-users/>
> >
> > The Call for Comment will last until 2020-03-04. Please send comments to
> > architecture-discuss@ietf.org and iab@iab.org.
> >
> > Abstract:
> >
> >     This document explains why the IAB believes the IETF should consider
> >     end users as its highest priority concern, and how that can be done.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IETF-Announce mailing list
> > IETF-Announce@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>
> Does this document represent an IAB consensus/aspiration or is this Mark
> writing as an IAB member?
>
> If the former, Mark should be listed as Editor, and the document should
> include text indicating how the IAB arrived at consensus (e.g. "This
> document represents the consensus of the IAB arrived at through
> (internal discussions | discussions with the community | workshop
> results | etc) " ).   If the latter, the document should indicate "This
> document represents the author's personal opinion".
>

Are there competing opinions on the IAB?

"The Internet is not for End Users" ?
"The Internet is for Network Operators" ?

thanks,
Rob