Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 19 May 2020 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD263A0867 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 May 2020 07:21:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.176
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.176 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Ymk2PwvOw5H for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 May 2020 07:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E2AB3A07ED for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 May 2020 07:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 04JELYtH017974 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 May 2020 16:21:34 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 41A9020D2A1 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 May 2020 16:21:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D2F20D279 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 May 2020 16:21:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.11.245.81] ([10.11.245.81]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 04JELXSl028509 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 May 2020 16:21:34 +0200
To: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
References: <158920530782.23655.6622928751672901506@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512152625.124c1588@elandnews.com> <d798d383-9bab-50f8-b6ee-dabb9cc37c2a@cs.tcd.ie> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512162358.0b239160@elandnews.com> <4548adba-834c-bfdd-36af-66b367408df8@cs.tcd.ie> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512191150.0bafa9a0@elandnews.com> <9161f68e-f51b-f97b-fc2b-372d24404209@cs.tcd.ie> <CAL0qLwZQxM+eDeZ+zFw3Gny7sy=jXi-1aUvE1B2RuO=M5CP_Sw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512232644.0d9328c8@elandnews.com> <CALaySJKs9oLXBN_UVq=Mn5ZefvrSgPyrV1J=1NMA0=YVDRnJVA@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200513081326.0ababe28@elandnews.com> <CALaySJKG7+g7u4p92axbZx4AxhwZgNfgfeHhE708EVpLs+iJjQ@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200513101502.0b0c7c90@elandnews.com> <CALaySJ++dWefRF5rbc0Fxp6wAFWJJH0rMt9u_5gv9BxN2adKbw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200513140922.0aebf148@elandnews.com> <F3AE398D-7BBF-4187-BEB4-9F3B55463662@kuehlewind.net> <95025E53-BF51-4D37-8007-ADE2D79A4908@gmail.com> <D2CBE5C9-A267-4337-9C3B-2213F4350E00@kuehlewind.net>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <f46c0a29-6d97-c0e5-2287-1783f0c1becb@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 16:21:33 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D2CBE5C9-A267-4337-9C3B-2213F4350E00@kuehlewind.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/rWhas9rb6kjvDH5KH-3zQVLNJOY>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Liaison reports
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 14:21:47 -0000

Hello,

Are these liaison reports specific to architecture?

Alex

Le 19/05/2020 à 14:17, Mirja Kuehlewind a écrit :
> Hello Bob,
> 
> Thanks for the proposal. I’ll check with the liaison shepherds and the rest of the IAB to make sure we have document the current practice correctly on this page and the IAB liaisons page.
> 
> Mirja
> 
> 
> 
>> On 18. May 2020, at 17:48, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Mirja,
>>
>> I suggest that the page at https://www.iab.org/liaisons/liaison-mgr-reports/ be updated with a note saying that there aren’t periodic reports and reports received are published in the minutes (and a link to the minutes).
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>>> On May 14, 2020, at 2:08 PM, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello S. Moonesamy,
>>>
>>> Thanks for pointing this out. It seems that the page was not correctly taken over when the IAB webpage was moved to a new system in 2011. The pages are restored now. However, as you can see and as noticed on the IAB liaison page itself, we don’t have the practice of collecting periodic report anymore, for a while already.
>>>
>>> As noted by Wes already, if reports are sent to the IAB or if liaison managers directly report in an IAB meeting, these are noted and published in the minutes instead.
>>>
>>> Mirja
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 13. May 2020, at 23:31, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear IAB Chair,
>>>>
>>>> I was searching for liaison reports.  Unfortunately, the link on the IAB web site ( https://www.iab.org/liaisons/liaison-mgr-reports/ ) is not working correctly.  I assume that the openness (Section 3.6 of RFC 2850) allows for those reports to be published.  Such reports could be useful information to people responding to IAB requests for comments on the IAB appointments.
>>>>
>>>> I would appreciate if the IAB could consider my request to publish all the liaison reports.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> S. Moonesamy
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Architecture-discuss mailing list
>>>> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Architecture-discuss mailing list
>>> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture-discuss mailing list
> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss
>