[arch-d] Liaison reports (was: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-06-11)

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 13 May 2020 21:31 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6683A0946; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:31:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ekSXf-mRona; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008DC3A093E; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.116.121.210]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 04DLVeWM001661 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 13 May 2020 14:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1589405512; x=1589491912; i=@elandsys.com; bh=0pUWovsb13fH3Au6T6y+K/Axjbc4HpeSo+Agak+083o=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=cvMML/vF1HS23tfTlA39EfZ2lch4s8Dw82K8V6ebNdzEs6gOZHjrPStUHXjbQhbpV /6RZddRdAjcw6uaDAnP2O6VTZ8RzwiNmZqb2Upvk5QuxA+z8jAHaVbq5PUzQZ4MlNQ KoGpy3RUTcz43VAqjtAQLSqVaNPp1tjeTr8F1vrg=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200513140922.0aebf148@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 14:31:28 -0700
To: iab-chair@iab.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Cc: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJ++dWefRF5rbc0Fxp6wAFWJJH0rMt9u_5gv9BxN2adKbw@mail.g mail.com>
References: <158920530782.23655.6622928751672901506@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512152625.124c1588@elandnews.com> <d798d383-9bab-50f8-b6ee-dabb9cc37c2a@cs.tcd.ie> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512162358.0b239160@elandnews.com> <4548adba-834c-bfdd-36af-66b367408df8@cs.tcd.ie> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512191150.0bafa9a0@elandnews.com> <9161f68e-f51b-f97b-fc2b-372d24404209@cs.tcd.ie> <CAL0qLwZQxM+eDeZ+zFw3Gny7sy=jXi-1aUvE1B2RuO=M5CP_Sw@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512232644.0d9328c8@elandnews.com> <CALaySJKs9oLXBN_UVq=Mn5ZefvrSgPyrV1J=1NMA0=YVDRnJVA@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200513081326.0ababe28@elandnews.com> <CALaySJKG7+g7u4p92axbZx4AxhwZgNfgfeHhE708EVpLs+iJjQ@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200513101502.0b0c7c90@elandnews.com> <CALaySJ++dWefRF5rbc0Fxp6wAFWJJH0rMt9u_5gv9BxN2adKbw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/shz8nmDJyK_J3GDm0P4gnsXOQ4o>
Subject: [arch-d] Liaison reports (was: Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-06-11)
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 21:31:56 -0000

Dear IAB Chair,

I was searching for liaison reports.  Unfortunately, the link on the 
IAB web site ( https://www.iab.org/liaisons/liaison-mgr-reports/ ) is 
not working correctly.  I assume that the openness (Section 3.6 of 
RFC 2850) allows for those reports to be published.  Such reports 
could be useful information to people responding to IAB requests for 
comments on the IAB appointments.

I would appreciate if the IAB could consider my request to publish 
all the liaison reports.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy