Re: [arch-d] [Chirp] on the nature of architecture discussion (was: Re: Fwd: IETF 107 Vancouver In-Person Meeting Cancelled)
Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Thu, 02 April 2020 16:37 UTC
Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60AEF3A040C for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 09:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.869
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.869 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EOxXeBCjMMs1 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 09:37:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BDAB3A03F1 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 09:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BE0548049; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 18:37:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 3A23D440040; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 18:37:05 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 18:37:05 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: "chirp@iab.org" <chirp@iab.org>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200402163705.GN28965@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <158386742797.16091.1025684270011519738@ietfa.amsl.com> <efbf8fd0-4673-3a93-2add-6bbc6ff0dca9@cs.tcd.ie> <a5046b41-b44e-d292-e0da-da6ec6d599ad@cs.tcd.ie> <20200402152717.GK28965@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <b295b296-2081-c969-78a2-42faae5ed9dd@cs.tcd.ie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b295b296-2081-c969-78a2-42faae5ed9dd@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/t1xVhiDbrwjcu2Gw8Og_w4mRlTM>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] [Chirp] on the nature of architecture discussion (was: Re: Fwd: IETF 107 Vancouver In-Person Meeting Cancelled)
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 16:37:25 -0000
I am complaining about the absence of a recurring, IAB organized architecture-discuss/dispatch meeting slot at IETF meetings. If we had this, then you could indicate that 'chirp' contributions are a preferred topic to be presented/discussed in such a track. You do encourage contributions by giving them these incentices: recurring meeting with longer time horizon: ability to plan putting cycles into a contribution. Present in a larger context of an arch-discuss track == reach out to more opportunistic participants. Cheers Toerless On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 04:32:05PM +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Hiya, > > On 02/04/2020 16:27, Toerless Eckert wrote: > > Why not ? > > I'd be really happy to organise a meeting for chirp. [1] > If people want one, just mail me or that list. > > But, I asked on the list already, as I just said, and > only 1 person was interested, so I'm very puzzled as > to what it is you are complaining about. > > S. > > [1] https://www.iab.org/mailman/listinfo/chirp > > pub RSA 4096/7B172BEA 2017-12-22 Stephen Farrell (2017) <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> > sub RSA 4096/36CB8BB6 2017-12-22 > -- --- tte@cs.fau.de
- [arch-d] on the nature of architecture discussion… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] [Chirp] on the nature of architectur… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [arch-d] on the nature of architecture discus… Jari Arkko
- Re: [arch-d] on the nature of architecture discus… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] [Chirp] on the nature of architectur… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] [Chirp] on the nature of architectur… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [arch-d] [Chirp] on the nature of architectur… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] on the nature of architecture discus… Melinda Shore
- Re: [arch-d] on the nature of architecture discus… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] [Chirp] on the nature of architectur… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [arch-d] on the nature of architecture discus… Melinda Shore
- Re: [arch-d] on the nature of architecture discus… tony.li
- Re: [arch-d] [Chirp] on the nature of architectur… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] on the nature of architecture discus… John Levine
- Re: [arch-d] on the nature of architecture discus… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] on the nature of architecture discus… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [arch-d] on the nature of architecture discus… Hutchison, David
- Re: [arch-d] on the nature of architecture discus… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [arch-d] on the nature of architecture discus… S Moonesamy
- Re: [arch-d] on the nature of architecture discus… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] on the nature of architecture discus… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [arch-d] on the nature of architecture discus… S Moonesamy
- Re: [arch-d] on the nature of architecture discus… Bob Briscoe
- Re: [arch-d] on the nature of architecture discus… Stewart Bryant
- Re: [arch-d] on the nature of architecture discus… Joseph Touch
- Re: [arch-d] on the nature of architecture discus… Toerless Eckert