Re: [arch-d] ETSI launches new group on Non-IP Networking addressing 5G new services

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Thu, 09 April 2020 12:19 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1997E3A09F4 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 05:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.871
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.871 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id irYmCNzEX0nB for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 05:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B02F3A09F3 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 05:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95576548045; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 14:19:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 8C557440040; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 14:19:41 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 14:19:41 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Cc: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20200409121941.GZ28965@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <60a10451-5fbd-fcec-5389-7a72870dcc84@gmail.com> <6A3A4410-A889-46C7-8FD5-7C5AA85486A1@tzi.org> <20200408054204.GA6005@nic.fr> <6C2A3533-7F75-45B1-9B51-19938597174B@tzi.org> <20200408194154.GJ28965@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4200C5F8-9F56-4FFF-90F4-7AD76A9F4FC8@eggert.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4200C5F8-9F56-4FFF-90F4-7AD76A9F4FC8@eggert.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/uwudu_kZnA6RUIo3-GidL6fMn-8>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] ETSI launches new group on Non-IP Networking addressing 5G new services
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 12:19:50 -0000

On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 12:14:04PM +0300, Lars Eggert wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 2020-4-8, at 22:41, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> > When technologies are young, you just let engineers
> > innovate and implement and when everything is done, you
> > can go and fight for it to get standardized. When an
> > industries becomes more mature and a lot more capital
> > investment heavy, you need to revert this and SDOs
> > need to play a lot more proactive role in defining
> > next-gen solutions. See 3GPP. IETF is not doing this
> > at the architecture scale. Only at small incremental
> > enhancements.
> 
> if this is what you belief needs to happen, please do take this work to the ITU-T.

Just making sure i understand your statement correctly:

You only want for IAB and IETF to continue do only small
incremental enhancements ?

Btw: I do not need to take any work to ITU-T or 3GPP.
These SDOs will move forward with whatever they want to
do without consulting IETF.

Cheers
    Toerless

> Lars



> _______________________________________________
> Architecture-discuss mailing list
> Architecture-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss


-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de