IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arch-d] centralization

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Sun, 14 March 2021 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B373A0A5E for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 09:57:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rVAPgoY-Eqaw for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 09:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [193.234.219.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88EEF3A0A65 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 09:57:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386266601CD; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 18:57:25 +0200 (EET)
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nNlEZjVhixQ8; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 18:57:24 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p226.piuha.net [193.234.219.226]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13EFE6601A2; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 18:57:24 +0200 (EET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <11840e55-3942-780f-00c6-038bd0a56d8c@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 18:57:23 +0200
Cc: Eliot Lear <lear=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "architecture-discuss@ietf.org" <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7876ED7A-44C1-4998-BBFE-3FF4CCB22B6B@piuha.net>
References: <0155CC72-571D-4540-8BD2-5A3B7FE4F7FB@lancaster.ac.uk> <11840e55-3942-780f-00c6-038bd0a56d8c@cs.tcd.ie>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/v1WXLmUFmDI-QsN3wIftVnCxbhs>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] centralization
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2021 16:57:30 -0000

This is maybe a side track for the original thread, but:

> Yeah, me too. It was funny that we had a good discussion
> on this list around the end of 2019 but then once we
> started a new list [1] it totally died

As discussed in the Covid-19 workshop, there’s quite a lot of even consumer interest in network resiliency and reliability as a result of the pandemic situation.

Jari

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email