Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "paper"

Guntur Wiseno Putra <> Wed, 06 May 2020 07:42 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B437A3A041E for <>; Wed, 6 May 2020 00:42:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RM3YG2G1IsoP for <>; Wed, 6 May 2020 00:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8CB23A041A for <>; Wed, 6 May 2020 00:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id r25so944486oij.4 for <>; Wed, 06 May 2020 00:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aJEGuS8imcp2XxZwnXVLLFfbbYu5MZ0x88AW5F8z5ks=; b=bQzw+VhoHjNjuddGRwTyTkrtVE3iePmUolw4XJvWuZdGm2ORJnZPhhzYTPrmmKf7J3 ZaR5d2W8FrmpjR43eKH0G5MXkeNINqa/yzy6X4bTfJ7w06k5RwW82ezndYD/BC0p76ZU PWRb+seRYAM5/SDRLLm4Unsw59ljRql2HrcHBw2redEfO2X3liGOdT6TRbYjo0+7qPja LgCrJFbVTR8Dx+WvmhDoB51XdTUcCQZWfcK/lx3Vt2BPq3oY2AlHxbrs4m28bVsIE3HF 9mZkMbW/dLg8ouRknpgs+HcaGgjP6CU/QfoN2mpR/MKVUT+K3iSvu20d/q+ynVauoJ47 dXHw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aJEGuS8imcp2XxZwnXVLLFfbbYu5MZ0x88AW5F8z5ks=; b=t/tT9fFj8mo3YW96wdlClt1Blcx2UHUTX7ZhR3GHfEHOA2BVwNH5rk6CxKMYXBBFGK qFyfykvGqfpnK799dMrKhFUaXk05/ftq3uhq2PxSyg4J4MrB72Hx6u4Ggs211wESeebI fHdj6fqzwfFxzTI526Ejz4X/K2wC9pXcLJx4JVYRQUKtmrBJ2YFWC4i4wd40CXe8DFtA skkP0hyAIse+2Gwle2f5aW4R2NRLvlyakw7MA15ONyQdjL7EcGuDzgPeh4pudnk1mi2U ujssrje8e+oqOGKEb4l5Fd5PXrSvGHTrbY+7cLsMKU6H4MvmZvF+xNk0AC8aZfkVqmP3 c0QQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZIHQiR3ITXegnQXm/duY++pJGelSQKneIedGIdTC7xNJvejaMS NaIxbb/RrtRiK+abKEJiYAnNwCsqAiW/8J0b9Oo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIpcd27KSVcg4dat6QxcMunC11zhlsqNukJ2TypnfhFS92aMxD1uQvBFD/k18GSn6a+ngwk4XnZm4uo0Bc2Jhc=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:f482:: with SMTP id s124mr1863441oih.128.1588750972704; Wed, 06 May 2020 00:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a9d:4809:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 6 May 2020 00:42:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <> <emde06c4fa-b2c1-418c-9f5d-50e5a28bbe6c@desktop-rub0n2r> <> <LO2P265MB0573C465963C5C75436952FEC2AA0@LO2P265MB0573.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <> <>
From: Guntur Wiseno Putra <>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 14:42:52 +0700
Message-ID: <>
To: Brian E Carpenter <>,,
Cc: Stephen Farrell <>, Andrew Campling <>, Toerless Eckert <>, Ian Peter <>,
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005d5e2305a4f5e986"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] FYI: "ISOC" "New IP" "discussion" "paper"
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 May 2020 07:43:00 -0000

Dear Brian, Carsten, Toerless,
architecture-discuss, &

An institutional collaborative platforms by the IETF and the ISOC working
on IP design :

* Carsten Bormann on the IETF liaisons on "New IP" (8Apr2020):

… and you can find one thoughtful piece of discussion from the IETF chair
at the unlikely place of

** Toerless Eckert on "Discussion Paper on An Analysis of the New IP
Proposal to the ITU-T" worked by the Internet Society (The1st of this


there is a collaborative platform which is about the IETF and the ISOC
working together on "New IP":

- institutional collaborations for Internet Standard Process : Those are in
accordance with what are mentioned in RFC 2026 which is especially about
the ISOC having important role in "Internet Standard Process" together with
other organizations involved in in the Internet standard process mentioned

"...The Internet Standards process is an activity of the Internet Society
that is organized and managed on behalf of the Internet community by the
Internet Architecture Board (IAB) and the Internet Engineering Steering
Group (IESG)".

(RFC 2026 -- Internet Standard Process

sec. 1. Introduction p. 3)

"The Internet Society (ISOC) is an international organization concerned
with the growth and evolution of the worldwide Internet and with the
social, political, and technical issues that arise from its use...

Internet standardization is an organized activity of the ISOC, with the
Board of Trustees being responsible for ratifying the procedures and rules
of the Internet standards process [B]".

(RFC 2028 sec. 3 "Key organization involved in the process" p. 4)

Guntur Wiseno Putra

Pada Jumat, 01 Mei 2020, Brian E Carpenter <>

> On 01-May-20 01:54, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> >
> > Hiya,
> >
> > On 30/04/2020 14:49, Andrew Campling wrote:
> >> In addition to the public mailing list that ISOC has subsequently
> >> created
> >> (, is
> >> there a suitable forum for discussion of the "New IP" proposal within
> >> the IETF (noting from earlier debate that the Architecture-discuss
> >> list is technically an IAB one)?
> > I'm confused. Why does it matter if arch-d is an IAB list?
> >
> > Seems to me that this is a reasonable list for discussion
> > of Internet architecture.
> As I have argued in my recent rant, the IETF (which of course appoints
> the IAB members) is probably the best venue we have. And the IAB's
> job description includes A for Architecture. So yes, as long as we
> don't imagine ourselves to have any power of decision.
>      Brian
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture-discuss mailing list