Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-06-11

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <> Wed, 13 May 2020 21:48 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D0D3A096A for <>; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:48:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b3c2zoYa8WbR for <>; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:48:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::932]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82B623A096E for <>; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:48:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id s5so390096uad.4 for <>; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:48:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aOIperxNjbGZPYkzTBFiRuCKmWWeYzxO2FbPYYWvKlk=; b=SkmXjJky5YnHjXF4yitO4aL/mFLvFgye5YrOdqpRHQa8NsSkNigaVIZ5+jOnse7a6h 1+Nc2i+8xFmSiHdrZQdDQyLOGKccCNuHzzjb70aBG39UNNQH7fv0pVwtZ5kJDucIUKhZ Hj7RgoLv7iYWn8JVDYOLMh3dXC1AcNTc3YGovNv0kzc1Ws84xHC2oKRJRBwrQWFGI6Dh kWamxy95vmS5UscDh9lJY99X8fQMYznizozSuMVkTbQvVdzl+q8mFJJkbT5aTA3IMm/r 86MHFiypne2hZtMprbcFFIu1bqj7MITk2BRw8+c6kAc5neH6jzFIHd9QbJ/1HLQndjkw YdQA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aOIperxNjbGZPYkzTBFiRuCKmWWeYzxO2FbPYYWvKlk=; b=dfg6qd1mqZ6fwVM0ynGoEOB5wRKMPxnxjAasmIYRhsKXT4IGVEU+gQ0XfxEZ7/+7sk NHlEircYlEdfXWfFmwFRG0xwPiCdkWgSFnUWUuYaKe7FBA0M0LiJudldSHi0mo077RBG XHBqKPwmRPnxnBrTCSd/hKxJzvX7lV2QYR2bCJqBgk6JYvVAnBqVWbxUq/MZz/uCcroV LXZ0BoE53wsfI9yuh7fSa9/mVwLg9+t0tZ4iNObHzJiNp93m5bsRwTZb8MK+duNXgtSN 08byFb81glTdIvXFkehXVWFxsnxq9m2R6AgNRhl0GqjHIDmh3g5etI2+oEvagtztx1w9 FTaA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530BGaQxKSMqVq0XGT0OiBPyOsjC0rUCKH1y/ubYLgBBkOpY1W+b HGTKI+HqEKDSe22ejZmH7ctra3gMS57K/ZdKj88=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJypU4BsVsZtWsFX3m4VT6Ap4Eb4M8MryWWBSW5nxU9poZxAdv0QK/xxl4oThY2vaJzV/V4NsVSR5e1aqY7tD6c=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:7c1:: with SMTP id d1mr1546110uaf.76.1589406483465; Wed, 13 May 2020 14:48:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 14:47:49 -0700
Message-ID: <>
To: S Moonesamy <>
Cc: Barry Leiba <>,,
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d9ca6305a58e885f"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-06-11
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 21:48:07 -0000

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:01 AM S Moonesamy <> wrote:

> If I understood the liaison programme correctly, there is some
> overhead on the IAB side as it has to assign one of its members to
> keep an eye on what is going on.  Is it useful to have a liaison
> relationship when there aren't any concerns or a need for formal
> representation?  That is the question which, in my opinion, is useful
> for the IAB to think about.

I was the IETF liaison to the Open Mobile Alliance for a time.  As there
was very little interchange between the two organizations over the years,
including during my tenure, the IAB chose not to re-appoint anyone and
simply discontinued the role when I stepped down.  Thus, I'm living proof
that the IAB does indeed think about this.

M3AAWG, on the other hand, has a handful of people that attend both their
sessions and ours, and Barry's list of work that's come to us from them is
a good example of why an established liaison is probably worth continuing.