Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-06-11

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 13 May 2020 06:35 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC62C3A0E06; Tue, 12 May 2020 23:35:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3Xv1alCSjafE; Tue, 12 May 2020 23:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.elandsys.com (mx.elandsys.com [162.213.2.210]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771263A0E05; Tue, 12 May 2020 23:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.116.121.210]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 04D6ZTnf021710 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 May 2020 23:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1589351743; x=1589438143; i=@elandsys.com; bh=7sn8oSjlWDkjqn75P9FxjbrDNVMX5BQkObPEk5YOSIg=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=XAw0KB6gvq0nzQatTm7+IWzDL2OngIX6cKcZjYnrw0u825M0uAHmJPiHv6KNAeW1S XZ1nzMxG0YpaW7UYB6tgeL9w4E+LTTnJ9gQKBNsCf9sjrf/NpxALlEbbjhDB8NgDPU UyolZNJ/q5EszZ968a+Phk8u4vHWUJB7OALtCv2M=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20200512232644.0d9328c8@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 23:35:18 -0700
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Cc: iab@iab.org, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwZQxM+eDeZ+zFw3Gny7sy=jXi-1aUvE1B2RuO=M5CP_Sw@mail.g mail.com>
References: <158920530782.23655.6622928751672901506@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512152625.124c1588@elandnews.com> <d798d383-9bab-50f8-b6ee-dabb9cc37c2a@cs.tcd.ie> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512162358.0b239160@elandnews.com> <4548adba-834c-bfdd-36af-66b367408df8@cs.tcd.ie> <6.2.5.6.2.20200512191150.0bafa9a0@elandnews.com> <9161f68e-f51b-f97b-fc2b-372d24404209@cs.tcd.ie> <CAL0qLwZQxM+eDeZ+zFw3Gny7sy=jXi-1aUvE1B2RuO=M5CP_Sw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/w2FJzO93CyAbZQcckrvcmopMHUk>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (dmarc) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-06-11
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 06:36:00 -0000

Hi Murray,
At 11:14 PM 12-05-2020, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
>Not speaking for Barry, but as the AD responsible for DMARC:

Ok.

>The meeting is being scheduled and operated as a typical WG interim 
>meeting, under IETF IPR rules and so forth, scheduled adjacent to a 
>M3AAWG session on the same topic.  The proximity is meant to 
>encourage participation in our forum by their members who are 
>typically fairly shy about doing so.

I read 
https://au.news.yahoo.com/valimail-extends-email-security-standards-172300535.html 
I could not help noticing that DMARC is described as an IETF 
publication.  Is that accurate?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy