Re: [arch-d] Time to reboot RFC1984 and RFC2804?

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Wed, 14 October 2020 02:20 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B90E3A131B for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 19:20:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.87
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.87 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8xLSlaJoy2j9 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 19:20:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A70993A1319 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2020 19:20:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F400548019; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 04:20:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 21A2C440059; Wed, 14 Oct 2020 04:20:30 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 04:20:30 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: "architecture-discuss@ietf.org" <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20201014022030.GJ57007@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <c5b37390-d463-fa35-215b-569698098d6a@cs.tcd.ie> <65CD5A4A-E7AD-4051-90A6-31AD536AB0AD@gmail.com> <e29dc18a-fd5d-ca0d-90a0-4ec840678054@gmail.com> <LO2P265MB0573F23F5C23ABD3933E49FDC2040@LO2P265MB0573.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20201014001246.GD57007@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <623a0c86-ca51-d07b-34b1-ddec84ac9207@cs.tcd.ie> <20201014005137.GE57007@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <2856893d-f8b0-8259-5316-2f6c0415fb72@cs.tcd.ie> <20201014013432.GF57007@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <be4bb8e7-3a8a-ae9e-9285-8833b897051a@cs.tcd.ie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <be4bb8e7-3a8a-ae9e-9285-8833b897051a@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/xXO8VRH8AY3WVuk10i_t4rWF-10>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Time to reboot RFC1984 and RFC2804?
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2020 02:20:38 -0000

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 02:49:30AM +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> 
> On 14/10/2020 02:34, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> > Stephen,
> > 
> > You are making all my argument better than i can.
> 
> We seem to agree about that:-)
> 
> You are as entirely welcome to misinterpret what I'm saying

I don't. You made yourself very clear.

> as ETSI are to call their weirdo horror-movie thing TLS:-)

You missed your window of opportunity for dismissive
name calling to have a lasting effect. If this work was done
in the IETF it could easily have been distinguished better
against TLS, including in name. 

Cheers
    Toerless

> S.

pub   RSA 4096/7B172BEA 2017-12-22 Stephen Farrell (2017) <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
> sub   RSA 4096/36CB8BB6 2017-12-22
> 




-- 
---
tte@cs.fau.de