Re: [arch-d] [IAB] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-for-the-users-02> (The Internet is for End Users)

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Thu, 06 February 2020 19:06 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966971200B2 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:06:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nKKZHsxVtoxT for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:06:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7C141200D8 for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 11:06:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=536; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1581016001; x=1582225601; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=bKe/U/33yc3NLlqDILiDqmUmQhBpqeMV38+SQkKvuh8=; b=VIwFnjjQ0LZeV2Yz9jHENq5KJvv7Ssc6EtQEucILCq/avwoEs90M2ZVr bfuko9TWSgOia+i+1fj6AlV1+ERvNcNwrn8nTlWmwiDxP39r5ECPn3LN7 AzamunMvXaWjclxpJw8zJPcSrH6U/EBrPnU8tkF6ThFOVakuXXe0jEQkn M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AKAQAhYzxe/xbLJq1mHQEBAQkBEQU?= =?us-ascii?q?FAYFqBQELAYNpIBKEP4kDo14JAQEBDAEBLwEBhEACgmE3Bg4CAw0BAQQBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?CAQUEbYVDhWcGHQZWEAsaAiYCAlcGgzmCfKxgdYEyhUqFEIEOKgGMPIIAgTg?= =?us-ascii?q?gghc1PoRLgxAygiwEr2uCRIJOk3gbgjiYU6ZWgy8CBAYFAhWBaCM+gRozGgg?= =?us-ascii?q?bFWUBgVlpPRIYDY5Vjg9AA456AQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,410,1574121600"; d="scan'208";a="23039808"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 06 Feb 2020 19:06:38 +0000
Received: from ams3-vpn-dhcp5100.cisco.com (ams3-vpn-dhcp5100.cisco.com [10.61.83.235]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 016J6cDm021373 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 6 Feb 2020 19:06:38 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <e73dea92-030a-f5f3-98e8-874b07705206@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 20:06:37 +0100
Cc: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, architecture-discuss@ietf.org, iab@iab.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <237AAA98-D69A-49CD-895A-88F0C68F9AB4@cisco.com>
References: <158094293707.31222.730373457433066701.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <deaf2366-b835-5ed5-48f3-6303b1836d7b@joelhalpern.com> <17b0861f-079f-4a12-914b-d88a9056ccd2@www.fastmail.com> <df12869f-7cc9-d90b-9866-78d00c4ff2e6@joelhalpern.com> <b5bb7eb9-1ddd-440d-ae26-5f147e3b8b4d@www.fastmail.com> <e73dea92-030a-f5f3-98e8-874b07705206@joelhalpern.com>
To: Joel Halpern Direct <jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.83.235, ams3-vpn-dhcp5100.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/y8V6TwPx94SbGfqvVRAXY8yQbHI>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] [IAB] Call for Comment: <draft-iab-for-the-users-02> (The Internet is for End Users)
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 19:06:43 -0000

At this point I find myself reasonably satisfied with where the document is going, and it has come a long way.  I like the broad description of users, and I think that’s quite appropriate.

I would only ask that the IAB do one more thing, which would be to take the opportunity to highlight cases where the advice would be actionable.  That has the added benefit of maybe identifying different user groups who should be brought into a conversation, a role to which the board should be well suited.

Eliot