IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 09 January 2020 18:11 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A311200CD; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 10:11:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q4pLmdCYFA6X; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 10:11:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 463C812004C; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 10:11:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050093.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 009I5KAf001010; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 18:11:51 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=TqElYi6Uzz27AAS1+gSIRKL9Nuvcooh7XLjEXsF7T+s=; b=fXTTfp9D55Ic2Nwj6FhYRp9So5lOCBI6r4wie3Bb/38WzNuPUtDGr0uc57DaTKP1Kvew AF7CfnzcCWHfXLCxzrmi3acuSD7OzUNA3FzCVZZ2W3ca3crRbmW1NSldNzMmqzAXtqVl O2JeEodRe4xl1itg9gRx9ac7lSzIpYyJnkg/9CiBKR7Vc8VRSTUPEpF0n6K92fB8HXJi yRNRd4EYq+KRIsKYrDTSGFWKaqE/bdXodYDkwvbncajf5npGv+d+thL2/WRLhxz02aEF N0Tg15FwZfOs6QTE+VoiuyCU1m3Rwi9FGeTrY1iRV1WNUxhyRtDwk2k2kwdY/yge+QkW Dg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint5 (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [184.51.33.60] (may be forged)) by m0050093.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2xd9fn6wp0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 09 Jan 2020 18:11:50 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 009I2jhT027036; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 10:11:49 -0800
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.31]) by prod-mail-ppoint5.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2xasjb4mnj-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 09 Jan 2020 10:11:49 -0800
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.103) by usma1ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 13:11:48 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) by usma1ex-dag1mb3.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.103]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 13:11:47 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: IAB Chair <iab-chair@iab.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "architecture-discuss@ietf.org" <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>, "iab@iab.org" <iab@iab.org>
Thread-Topic: Draft IAB conflict of interest policy
Thread-Index: AQHVxnmMup37bT2dZUClj9/F6vIplqfio4+A
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 18:11:47 +0000
Message-ID: <C7834943-A7AD-49D2-B748-E22A1E82A014@akamai.com>
References: <4e888f0a-a1e8-df72-cbbc-9a2e2f0d0d05@iab.org>
In-Reply-To: <4e888f0a-a1e8-df72-cbbc-9a2e2f0d0d05@iab.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.21.0.200104
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.118.52]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C7834943A7AD49D2B748E22A1E82A014akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2020-01-09_03:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=888 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-2001090149
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.572 definitions=2020-01-09_03:2020-01-09, 2020-01-09 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=864 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-2001090149
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/architecture-discuss/yeMOUHY0hyqE1FpEAfeueY3URtU>
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Draft IAB conflict of interest policy
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/architecture-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>, <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 18:11:53 -0000

I assume this was reviewed by the appropriate/relevant legal counsel?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email