Re: [Arcing] arcing - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 95

Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org> Mon, 07 March 2016 17:19 UTC

Return-Path: <edward.lewis@icann.org>
X-Original-To: arcing@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: arcing@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D6A1CD5D5; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 09:19:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.41]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j-vRaVGk0kIY; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 09:19:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-2.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F8421CD5DA; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 09:19:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-2.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:43:41 -0800
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1130.005; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:43:41 -0800
From: Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Arcing] arcing - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 95
Thread-Index: AQHRcNG/gerIqTBN0kC0zakX9nQarJ9ILiOAgABiJgCABeFXgA==
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 16:43:39 +0000
Message-ID: <D3031992.14372%edward.lewis@icann.org>
References: <20160226194955.23064.53842.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D2FDD769.1422C%edward.lewis@icann.org> <CA+9kkMB_1P+JAod6G9of_y7Q7JbbG2SBYw2VyCSnGr7zASGVng@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMB_1P+JAod6G9of_y7Q7JbbG2SBYw2VyCSnGr7zASGVng@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.1.160122
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.47.234]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="B_3540195813_31615510"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/arcing/d0yEaL1-NodUsoCQ2XJms0vKE0Q>
Cc: "arcing@ietf.org" <arcing@ietf.org>, "arcing-chairs@ietf.org" <arcing-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Arcing] arcing - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 95
X-BeenThere: arcing@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: This list will discuss different architectural approaches to signalling alternative resolution contexts for Internet names <arcing.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/arcing>, <mailto:arcing-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/arcing/>
List-Post: <mailto:arcing@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:arcing-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arcing>, <mailto:arcing-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 17:19:10 -0000

I'm not sure I have another draft in me (yet) but there is plenty to talk
about.

As for my existing draft, I'm willing to speak to it.  (Sorry for being slow
to respond, just cycling through topics.)

On 3/3/16, 12:55, "Ted Hardie" <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ed,
> 
> It was approved as a nonw-WG forming BoF, based on the agenda proposed in the
> wiki https://tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki.  If there's a new draft you'd like
> discussed, please let the list know; I had already planned to ask you to
> discuss your history draft, so consider this your friendly ping on that point.
> 
> best,
> 
> Ted
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org> wrote:
>> Is ARCING a formal working group?  I don't see it listed on
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/.
>> 
>> On 2/26/16, 11:49, "Arcing on behalf of "IETF Meeting Session Request
>> Tool"" <arcing-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of
>> session_request_developers@ietf.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> >---------------------------------------------------------
>>> >Working Group Name: Alternative Resolution Contexts for Internet Naming
>> 
>> Perhaps the same tool is used for WGs and BoFs, hence the use of "Working
>> Group" here.  On the other hand, maybe ARCING has been made a WG.  Can't
>> tell.
>> 
>> This says it isn't chartered (found this using a web search engine, not
>> from the IETF web site), state is BoF:
>> 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/arcing/charter/
>> 
>> 
>> If this is a BoF, what's the plan for an agenda?  I ask because I have a
>> draft already but I also feel the need to document why this is a problem
>> based on hallway conversations and observations about the state of play.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Arcing mailing list
>> Arcing@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arcing
>> 
>