Re: [Arcing] arcing - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 95

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 03 March 2016 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: arcing@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: arcing@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED2E21B2AB6; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 09:56:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R_oFAzJIDLMe; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 09:56:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x231.google.com (mail-qg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 077731B2A95; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 09:56:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qg0-x231.google.com with SMTP id w104so23303887qge.1; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 09:56:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hjWFM6XVgvQ8kJPwVeNykOdWFdg9w1U2paeEda7B2ow=; b=wzm1SvLQD/QAQ2TebyffF+EC3vAkrxe8TUMSI32bP8VNupi7drH8WF1tH0CL1+7djV i45IAlHsNBlWT0nJBg2lCHM1CVm/plsblG2o4OSbWTIkIzVRsCSy+Gpjhyfvtk8baCvu K6oLDE/2P79HwnhdYxKyeBb5HmWcUvlgnXwPzvSjHEF4qp+ma80AX20xK0RSeRZL8dKy GO8q5OEH4zwXNCsij8HDlANDUrWhoedmVFfcf7JpZM4sdRDFHoLnfKa1EIdNKgCd0uZw 0/1loPsbFrTKt/39AHPOJpnQxD5AFQ54HZDTQL1ZoHwkrMP38PO7cq3tiiCAcoaIQYWk yWKw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hjWFM6XVgvQ8kJPwVeNykOdWFdg9w1U2paeEda7B2ow=; b=AO+OOUL8ntY9NX2mQpbVWz7e/kPN1Y34yfPANQvYeiBsZC9vvs5AYjhF+d4hN9L36Q 3vwCboGqVUFR+L4TVRNoyxf5TpxQx3oR3XZZqPWSr1mUIQZ1P8SAart+nqCKYiiDOJ9e Z/HNJ2Ct8KS0yA1OeGvW3ypifBZMG0Y9aEQvyPUtMeuTFMAzPmJ1lsoX4Ay1pH79AZec yBOGyo+8j0V4xRFWO5tMRUJFdffwfuFjtoRp4s3zqFU2F7wRNtx2ZQiKIqIv2YeAc/lQ MkFEBr0KxVmhXLrPRb0vpXyOgXgBnbfWmsfTz8oVjoxo6hzCzx8lzofau2T+ZkafZaY/ 7UOQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIY92dh/CfgTbDj0Ap9ZFFZLKw2aC7Njv1R1S1FpCRLXnoEYSEMryUMr8yZkYB1usGeko515dI9NZxZxw==
X-Received: by 10.140.128.21 with SMTP id 21mr5093744qha.36.1457027763978; Thu, 03 Mar 2016 09:56:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.6.13 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Mar 2016 09:55:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D2FDD769.1422C%edward.lewis@icann.org>
References: <20160226194955.23064.53842.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D2FDD769.1422C%edward.lewis@icann.org>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 09:55:44 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMB_1P+JAod6G9of_y7Q7JbbG2SBYw2VyCSnGr7zASGVng@mail.gmail.com>
To: Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c173144cc7a2052d28b680
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/arcing/to7lAvVR9g2awN-9Ep9L35D5zUc>
Cc: "arcing@ietf.org" <arcing@ietf.org>, "arcing-chairs@ietf.org" <arcing-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Arcing] arcing - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 95
X-BeenThere: arcing@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: This list will discuss different architectural approaches to signalling alternative resolution contexts for Internet names <arcing.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/arcing>, <mailto:arcing-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/arcing/>
List-Post: <mailto:arcing@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:arcing-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arcing>, <mailto:arcing-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 17:56:10 -0000

Hi Ed,

It was approved as a nonw-WG forming BoF, based on the agenda proposed in
the wiki  https://tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki.  If there's a new draft
you'd like discussed, please let the list know; I had already planned to
ask you to discuss your history draft, so consider this your friendly ping
on that point.

best,

Ted




On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org> wrote:

> Is ARCING a formal working group?  I don't see it listed on
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/.
>
> On 2/26/16, 11:49, "Arcing on behalf of "IETF Meeting Session Request
> Tool"" <arcing-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of
> session_request_developers@ietf.org> wrote:
>
> >---------------------------------------------------------
> >Working Group Name: Alternative Resolution Contexts for Internet Naming
>
> Perhaps the same tool is used for WGs and BoFs, hence the use of "Working
> Group" here.  On the other hand, maybe ARCING has been made a WG.  Can't
> tell.
>
> This says it isn't chartered (found this using a web search engine, not
> from the IETF web site), state is BoF:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/arcing/charter/
>
>
> If this is a BoF, what's the plan for an agenda?  I ask because I have a
> draft already but I also feel the need to document why this is a problem
> based on hallway conversations and observations about the state of play.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Arcing mailing list
> Arcing@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arcing
>
>