Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter for arcmedia

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Sat, 03 January 2015 07:33 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: arcmedia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECCE11A8984; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 23:33:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WdMboj8H5WCW; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 23:33:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com (mail-wi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C3A91A897A; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 23:33:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id em10so534539wid.17; Fri, 02 Jan 2015 23:33:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=VrDec5ILqOjPsYxXhLcFIuqefMP1Wwwryq8xwoPX4Eo=; b=Jjf4rHbSLnxjQZP6a7GjAGAVxTM4Mw02mzJaVwdcINFiHp43TdjO9uxc9RS/Ipsq5X HF4BARoiUwkFzJnS/YWFqqJOH5bYQOOE1qK4FJ6scYT3O+R/YlyEgAvcG9k5Agfm7Hy7 VJVTXrmHWmvtji2UI8VuwlO4rOZTkGkrWYQbAgQj0UHCdb+Toxt2/rEMa6mLe2eyhvvI KDnafkm4xDPq6PWtJH/W0uJJXUCMCxcoQkSQYHv4XaqnRfZrgNp4mehsWFhLrXwjopzj 0WSgfElc8zBFTjqIlBu0vTmM0DsAhgP3mNXk4vCwJuO5sldbwBIE2sc/1h9cACLR9U3x L+nA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.181.29.198 with SMTP id jy6mr12398340wid.0.1420270398258; Fri, 02 Jan 2015 23:33:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.27.204.198 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jan 2015 23:33:18 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <286F8573-CD20-49DD-A361-B2D610D229AB@seantek.com>
References: <CAL0qLwYdnW+o4WUb72VM6yuEP8-jBxQ-KgYQm7KP2Sq9E6dp5g@mail.gmail.com> <CAPRnXtkg5GzLmPOWP=DrV8gTvgV+XDhOi=n3OZ86Yrhw+hOgJA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwad-UcKECA=m7Zqhw+VZ6wy=bFPVKs_ik+fqjPW7-U7cQ@mail.gmail.com> <54A41D6C.9010501@ninebynine.org> <DM2PR0201MB09606618607D909EA82635E0C35C0@DM2PR0201MB0960.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <86C96FDF-9A48-43A3-B38A-468F4407AD82@mnot.net> <CAL0qLwbfU7MPFiBngDXjv4WND1d1=Y3H=FJs6AP6EQvsPqYcFA@mail.gmail.com> <CACweHNAvZopEPN5zbwT0fXOVXSNimr0UeKbABOfrsgM4HGjP-Q@mail.gmail.com> <DM2PR0201MB09603E51D030435C30B8A069C35D0@DM2PR0201MB0960.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <286F8573-CD20-49DD-A361-B2D610D229AB@seantek.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 23:33:18 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZujCxm1a3C55Tz+d5enS+hotbA=mnAkwHKTtWtH+wXww@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c3469492c5eb050bba78ce"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/arcmedia/G_GMgUoteJ8oQeu8gTugoDrfqS8
Cc: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>, IETF Apps Discuss <apps-discuss@ietf.org>, "arcmedia@ietf.org" <arcmedia@ietf.org>, Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Public TAG List <www-tag@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [arcmedia] [apps-discuss] Proposed charter for arcmedia
X-BeenThere: arcmedia@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of creating a new top-level media type, \"archive\", for archive bundles." <arcmedia.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/arcmedia>, <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/arcmedia/>
List-Post: <mailto:arcmedia@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/arcmedia>, <mailto:arcmedia-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 07:33:21 -0000

On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Sean Leonard <dev+ietf@seantek.com> wrote:

> > "The W3C TAG work on packaging and archives, currently in progress, will
> also be observed.”
>
> “observed” has two definitions: “will be looked at for informational
> purposes”, and “will be followed (respected = treated as normative)”.
>

Since the thing being observed is a work-in-progress outside of the IETF, I
guessed that wouldn't be taken normatively.

How about "considered"?

-MSK